ArticleAIDS and behavior2025
Suboptimal Patient-Provider Communication About Undetectable = Untransmittable and HIV Transmission Risk in Australia and the US.
Article in AIDS and behavior, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- U = U for all: Advancing equity in HIV prevention.PLoS medicine · 2026Article
- The HIV-treatment-as-prevention adoption cascade among U.S. men and gender-minority individuals who have sex with men.medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences · 2026Article
- A call to action to advance global research priorities related to Undetectable = Untransmittable.Journal of the International AIDS Society · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
14 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The Undetectable = Untransmittable (U = U) campaign aims to raise global awareness that people living with HIV whose viral load is undetectable cannot sexually transmit HIV. Healthcare providers are uniquely positioned to disseminate the U = U message. Our study explored patient-provider communication about U = U and HIV risk from the perspectives of gay, bisexual, and other men living with HIV (MLHIV) and healthcare providers engaged in HIV treatment and prevention service delivery. We conducted 40 semi-structured interviews with key informants recruited through HIV community-based and professional organizations in Australia (n = 20) and the US (n = 20). Key informants included 20 MLHIV and 20 providers. Data were analyzed thematically. MLHIV were cisgender men aged 29-67 years (M[SD] = 52[13.1]). Providers were cisgender adults aged 30-65 years (M[SD] = 38[9.0]). MLHIV preferred that providers use clear and direct language to explain U = U. When prompted to explain U = U as they would to patients, 8 of 10 Australian and 4 of 10 US providers used language consistent with those preferences. MLHIV, especially US MLHIV, reported that their providers' explanation of the U = U message was often absent, ambiguous, or inaccurate in practice. Such suboptimal communication aligned with the skepticism about U = U and concerns about patient behavior (e.g., adherence) expressed by several providers in the study. Providers relayed multiple reservations regarding new World Health Organization recommendations about informing patients that low-level viremia (detectable viral load ≥ copies/mL) conferred "almost zero" risk. Many Australian and US providers would benefit from training developed in collaboration with people living with HIV to improve patient-provider communication about U = U and HIV transmission risk.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.