Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40608179›Full record

ArticleBreast cancer research and treatment2025

Adherence to breast screening guidelines and breast cancer mortality: a population cohort study.

Rebecca A G Christensen, Geoffrey M Anderson, Shana J Kim, Arian Aminoleslami, Jennifer D Brooks

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Breast cancer research and treatment, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Rebecca A G ChristensenPublic Health Sciences, Dalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Geoffrey M AndersonPublic Health Sciences, Dalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Shana J KimPublic Health Sciences, Dalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Arian AminoleslamiInstitute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Jennifer D BrooksPublic Health Sciences, Dalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada. jennifer.brooks@utoronto.ca.

Funding

Canadian Institutes of Health Research Fellowship Award 473057Canadian Institutes of Health Research Trajectory Grant 322718CIHR RN312225-376411
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPopulation-based breast screening programs diagnose cancers at earlier stage when they are easier to treat. Indeed, individuals screened as part of the Ontario Breast Screening Program (OBSP) are diagnosed with a lower stage of breast cancer than those who have never been screened. We sought to determine if adherence to OBSP guidelines is associated with differences in the rate of death from breast cancer in addition to cancer stage at diagnosis.

methods48,927 women ≥ 51 years diagnosed with a first primary breast cancer in Ontario 2010-2017 were included and classified as an adherent screener, partial screener, or non-screener. The cohort was developed using administrative health databases linked by Ontario Health. Cause-specific hazard ratios (HR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) were used to examine the association between adherence to OBSP guidelines and the rate of breast cancer death adjusting for age, rurality, and history of a prior cancer diagnosis. Death from non-breast cancer causes was considered a competing risk.

resultsCompared to adherent screenings, non-screeners and non-adherent screeners had higher rates of death from breast cancer (HR: 3.59, 95% CI 3.30-3.90 and HR: 1.69, 95% CI 1.47-1.95 respectively). Further, non-adherent screeners (i.e., screened ≥ once) had a lower rate of breast cancer death than non-screeners (HR: 0.47, 95% CI 0.41-0.54).

interpretationIndividuals screened in the OBSP have a lower rate of death from breast cancer than non-screeners, even if they are not meeting screening guidelines. These findings suggest women should be encouraged to participate in breast screening regardless of their frequency of use.

Indexed as

Breast NeoplasmsEarly Detection of CancerGuideline AdherenceAgedCohort StudiesFemaleHumansMammographyMass ScreeningMiddle AgedOntarioPractice Guidelines as TopicBreast cancerMortalityScreening

Identifiers

PMID40608179
PMCPMC12259713

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.