ArticleDiscover oncology2025
Practical pathological methods for reliable diagnosis of secretory carcinomas of the salivary gland.
Article in Discover oncology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
18 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Secretory carcinomas (SCs) of the salivary gland have recently been recognized as low-grade, malignant tumors. Before this designation, most SCs were diagnosed as variants of acinic cell carcinomas (AciCCs). SCs harbor the t(12;15)(p13;q25) translocation that generates an oncogenic fusion gene, ETS variant transcription factor 6/Neurotrophic tyrosine receptor kinase(ETV6::NTRK3). However, detecting fusion genes in a clinical setting is time-consuming and costly. In this study, we examined 31 cases previously diagnosed as AciCC and SC using pathological analyses with detection of fusion genes using ETV6 break-apart fluorescence in-situ hybridization and reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction. After re-analysis, we found that these 31 cases actually comprised 21 SCs and 10 AciCCs. We examined the diagnostic utility of immunohistochemistry by comparing results with the fusion gene, Pan-Trk, which despite having recently been reported as effective for diagnosis of SC, was not universally accurate. However, combining mammaglobin and S-100 could be particularly useful in diagnosing SC. This practical method will contribute to accurate diagnosis of SCs, while saving time in daily clinical practice.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.