ReviewAdvances and technical standards in neurosurgery2025
Blake Pouch: It Is Time to Revisit Classical Descriptions on the Development of the Roof of the Fourth Ventricle.
Review in Advances and technical standards in neurosurgery, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Cystic anomalies of the posterior fossa constitute an important chapter of the malformations of this region. Their interpretation is largely based on the existence of a pouch described by Joseph Blake in 1900. We have reviewed the ancient literature on which this description is based. All human data were obtained from only three fetuses. The histological and embryological analysis of these observations leads us to remain very cautious as to their significance. Indeed, this region of the posterior fossa is very fragile and subject to numerous technical artifacts. In addition, errors in fetal age lead us to believe that one of the observations cannot be used. It is therefore appropriate to be very careful when using this old literature. All these elements justify the need to revisit this problem in order to determine the normal development of this region in humans.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40608098What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.