Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40608094›Full record

ArticleEuropean radiology2026

Reduction of radiation exposure and preserved image quality using photon-counting detector cardiac computed tomography without electrocardiographic gating in children with congenital heart disease.

Susanne Hellms, Thomas Werncke, Joachim Böttcher, Christoph M Happel, Jan Eckstein, Markus Benedikt Krueger, Christoph Panknin, Alexander Pfeil, Till F Kaireit, Philipp Beerbaum and 3 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in European radiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Susanne HellmsInstitute of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany. Hellms.Susanne@mh-hannover.de.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9604-2691
Thomas WernckeInstitute of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany.
Joachim BöttcherFriedrich-Schiller-University Jena, Jena, Germany.
Christoph M HappelClinic for Pediatric Cardiology and Intensive Care, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany.
Jan EcksteinInstitute of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany.
Markus Benedikt KruegerInstitute of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany.
Christoph PankninSiemens Healthineers, Forchheim, Germany.
Alexander PfeilDepartment of Internal Medicine III, University Hospital Jena, Jena, Germany.
Till F KaireitInstitute of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany.
Philipp BeerbaumClinic for Pediatric Cardiology and Intensive Care, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany.
Jens Vogel-ClaussenInstitute of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany.
Frank WackerInstitute of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany.
Diane Miriam RenzInstitute of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesTo evaluate the radiation exposure, quantitative, and qualitative image quality in pediatric cardiac CT by using photon-counting detector computed tomography (PCD CT) versus energy-integrating detector CT (EID CT) in matched children. MATERIALS AND

methodsThirty-seven contrast-enhanced, clinically indicated cardiac CTs performed on PCD CT were matched with 37 examinations acquired by EID CT. The patients were matched according to water-equivalent diameters. Quantitative evaluation of image quality comprised a region of interest (ROI)-based analysis, calculating image noise, signal-to-noise (SNR) and contrast-to-noise (CNR) ratio. Differences of the attenuation variation of the paraspinal and the pectoral muscles were calculated to measure beam hardening artifacts. Volume CT dose index (CTDI

resultsThe mean age of the children on PCD CT was 794 ± 1016 days, similar to the mean age of 815 ± 957 days of the children on EID CT (p = 0.76). Moreover, age, height, weight, and body mass index (BMI) were also not significantly different between the two groups (p ≥ 0.32). Radiation exposure was significantly lower on PCD CT (CTDI

conclusionsWith a reduction in radiation exposure exceeding 40% by using PCD CT, image quality remained stable compared to EID CT. Reducing radiation with PCD CT while preserving image quality might substantially advance cardiac imaging in children. KEY POINTS: Question Children are particularly sensitive to radiation exposure, highlighting the need for dose reduction. Findings Radiation dosage can be significantly reduced while preserving image quality when using photon-counting detector (PCD) CT in pediatric patients with congenital heart disease. Clinical relevance Since radiation exposure can be significantly reduced by PCD CT compared to energy-integrating detector (EID) CT, while image quality was comparable, PCD CT is advisable for children with congenital heart disease.

Indexed as

Heart Defects, CongenitalRadiation ExposureTomography, X-Ray ComputedArtifactsCardiac-Gated Imaging TechniquesChildChild, PreschoolContrast MediaElectrocardiographyFemaleHumansInfantInfant, NewbornMalePhotonsRadiation DosageContrast MediaHeart defects (Congenital)PediatricRadiation dosageTomography (X-ray computed)

Identifiers

PMID40608094
PMCPMC12712116

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.