Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40608082›Full record

Trial reportIntensive care medicine2025

Melatonin for prevention of delirium in patients receiving mechanical ventilation in the intensive care unit: a multiarm multistage adaptive randomized controlled clinical trial (DEMEL).

Armand Mekontso Dessap, Jean-Damien Ricard, Damien Contou, Cyrielle Desnos, Maxens Decavèle, Romain Sonneville, Emmanuel Vivier, Nicolas Terzi, Jean-Christophe Callahan, Sebastien Jochmans and 10 more

Registry-linked trialAbstract readRandomized Controlled TrialMulticenter StudyClinical Trial, Phase II
In one paragraph

Trial report in Intensive care medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03524937 (Prevention of Delirium in Intensive Care by Melatonin), which is not on this map. Cited by 13 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03524937 phase2 / phase3completednot on this map

Prevention of Delirium in Intensive Care by Melatonin: a Prospective, Multicentre, Randomized, Double Blind, Placebo, Multi-arm, Multi-stage Study

TypeinterventionalSponsorAssistance Publique - Hôpitaux de ParisRan2019 to 2021Enrolled355ConditionsMechanically Ventilated PatientsArmsMELATONIN (HIGH DOSE), MELATONIN (LOW DOSE), PLACEBO
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Article
  5. Comparison of Two Doses of Prophylactic Melatonin on Incidence of Delirium in Intensive Care Unit Patients: A Randomized Controlled Trial.Indian journal of critical care medicine : peer-reviewed, official publication of Indian Society of Critical Care Medicine · 2026
    Article
  6. Comparison of Two Doses of Prophylactic Melatonin on Incidence of Delirium in Intensive Care Unit Patients: A Randomized Controlled Trial.Indian journal of critical care medicine : peer-reviewed, official publication of Indian Society of Critical Care Medicine · 2026
    Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. 0.3 mg Melatonin: still too much?Intensive care medicine · 2025
    Article
  13. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

20 authors.

Armand Mekontso DessapGroupe de Recherche Clinique GR05 CARMAS, Université Paris Est Créteil, Institut Mondor de Recherche Biomédicale, INSERM, Créteil, France. armand.dessap@aphp.fr.ORCID 0000-0001-5961-5577
Jean-Damien RicardService de Médecine Intensive Réanimation, Hôpital Louis Mourier, AP-HP, Colombes, France.
Damien ContouGroupe de Recherche Clinique GR05 CARMAS, Université Paris Est Créteil, Institut Mondor de Recherche Biomédicale, INSERM, Créteil, France.
Cyrielle DesnosGroupe de Recherche Clinique GR05 CARMAS, Université Paris Est Créteil, Institut Mondor de Recherche Biomédicale, INSERM, Créteil, France.
Maxens DecavèleService de Médecine Intensive-Réanimation (Département R3S), UMRS1158 Neurophysiologie Respiratoire Expérimentale Et Clinique, APHP Sorbonne Université, Site Pitié-Salpêtrière, Sorbonne Université, INSERM, Paris, France.
Romain SonnevilleUMR 1137, Department of Intensive Care Medicine, Université Paris Cité, INSERM, APHP Bichat-Claude Bernard University Hospital, Paris, France.
Emmanuel VivierGroupe de Recherche Clinique GR05 CARMAS, Université Paris Est Créteil, Institut Mondor de Recherche Biomédicale, INSERM, Créteil, France.
Nicolas TerziMedical Intensive Care Unit, Grenoble Alpes University, INSERM 1300, HP2, University Hospital of Grenoble Alpes, Grenoble, France.
Jean-Christophe CallahanService de Réanimation Polyvalente, Centre Hospitalier du Mans, Le Mans, France.
Sebastien JochmansGroupe de Recherche Clinique GR05 CARMAS, Université Paris Est Créteil, Institut Mondor de Recherche Biomédicale, INSERM, Créteil, France.
Rusel LeonGroupe de Recherche Clinique GR05 CARMAS, Université Paris Est Créteil, Institut Mondor de Recherche Biomédicale, INSERM, Créteil, France.
Serge CarreiraGroupe de Recherche Clinique GR05 CARMAS, Université Paris Est Créteil, Institut Mondor de Recherche Biomédicale, INSERM, Créteil, France.
Saad NseirService de Médecine Intensive Réanimation, Inserm, Institut Pasteur de Lille, U1167, Université de Lille, CHU Lille, Lille, France.
Frank ChemouniService de Médecine Intensive Réanimation, Grand Hôpital de L'Est Francilien Marne La Vallée, Marne La Vallée, France.
Vincent CastelainService de médecine intensive-réanimation, Fédération de Médecine Translationnelle de Strasbourg, Hôpital de Hautepierre, Hôpitaux Universitaires de Strasbourg, UR 3072, Université de Strasbourg, Strasbourg, France.
Muriel PaulService de Pharmacie Et UPREC, Hôpitaux Universitaires Henri Mondor, AP-HP, Créteil, France.
Jean-François BenoistBiochemistry Unit, AP-HP, Hôpital Universitaire Robert-Debré, Paris, France.
Etienne AudureauUnité de Recherche Clinique Henri Mondor, Hôpitaux Universitaires Henri Mondor, AP-HP, Institut Mondor de Recherche Biomédicale, INSERM U955, Université Paris Est Créteil, Créteil, France.
Keyvan RazaziGroupe de Recherche Clinique GR05 CARMAS, Université Paris Est Créteil, Institut Mondor de Recherche Biomédicale, INSERM, Créteil, France.
CARMAS and the REVA research networks, on behalf of the DEMEL Investigators

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo determine the dose of melatonin with an optimal pharmacokinetic profile and to test whether this dose reduces the prevalence of delirium in mechanically ventilated ICU patients as compared to placebo.

methodsDEMEL, a multicenter adaptive phase 2b/3 randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind trial included patients at 20 health centers in France from February 1st, 2019 through January 5th, 2021. Patients were randomized (1:1:1) to receive either placebo or low (0.3 mg) or high (3 mg) dose melatonin enterally at 9:00 p.m. for 14 consecutive nights or until death or ICU discharge, whichever came first. The interim primary endpoint (activity stage) was the percentage of patients who achieved an optimal melatonin pharmacokinetic profile 24 h after starting study treatment; the final primary endpoint (efficacy phase) was the percentage of patients who experienced delirium between randomization and day 14 (or until death or ICU discharge, whichever came first). Delirium was assessed twice daily using the Confusion Assessment Method for ICU.

resultsWe randomized 355 patients and included 334 in the primary analysis. At the preplanned analysis of the activity stage performed in 75 patients, the low-dose melatonin group had the highest rate of optimal pharmacokinetic profiles (12/24, 50%) when compared with the high-dose melatonin group (6/25, 24%) and the placebo group (0/26). Therefore, the Steering Committee recommended that the high-dose melatonin group be discontinued and that the low-dose melatonin group be selected to continue in the efficacy phase along with the placebo group. At the end of the efficacy stage, there was no difference in the final primary outcome of delirium incidence between the low-dose melatonin group and the placebo group: 80/147 (54.4%) vs 85/154 (55.2%), risk ratio, 0.986 [95% CI 0.803 to 1.211]; key secondary outcomes were also similar between groups. These included sleep quality, delirium-free, coma-free, and ventilator-free days at day 28; ICU and hospital length of stay; mortality at day 28, in the ICU, and in hospital; as well as long-term outcomes such as quality of life and postintensive care syndrome at day 90.

conclusionsThis randomized clinical trial found that the low-dose of melatonin (0.3 mg nightly) achieved a better pharmacokinetic profile than the high-dose (3 mg nightly), but did not change the incidence of delirium compared to placebo in mechanically ventilated critically-ill patients.

trial registrationClinicalTrial.gov website (NCT03524937).

Indexed as

DeliriumMelatoninRespiration, ArtificialAgedDouble-Blind MethodFemaleFranceHumansIntensive Care UnitsMaleMiddle AgedMelatoninDeliriumMelatoninPharmacokineticsVentilation

Identifiers

PMID40608082
PMCPMC12283818

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.