Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40607992›Full record

ArticleTrends in hearing

Evaluating Selective Apical Electrode Deactivation for Improving Cochlear Implant Outcomes.

Katelyn A Berg, Jack H Noble, Benoit M Dawant, René H Gifford

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Trends in hearing. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Katelyn A BergDepartment of Hearing and Speech Sciences, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-4455-3566
Jack H NobleDepartment of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN, USA.
Benoit M DawantDepartment of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN, USA.
René H GiffordDepartment of Hearing and Speech Sciences, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, USA.

Funding

Overall: Eunice Kennedy Shriver Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities Research Center at VanderbiltP50HD103537 · NICHD · VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER · PI Lea K Davis · 2020 to 2026
$10.3M
Model-based Cochlear Implant ProgrammingR01DC014037 · NIDCD · VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY · PI NOBLE, JACK · 2014 to 2024
$5.0M
Cochlear Implants: Combined Electric and Binaural Acoustic StimulationR01DC009404 · NIDCD · VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER · PI GIFFORD, RENE H · 2010 to 2019
$3.4M
Computer-assisted, image-guided programming of Cochlear ImplantsR01DC014462 · NIDCD · VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY · PI DAWANT, BENOIT M. · 2016 to 2020
$2.9M
Optimizing cochlear implants for music perceptionF32DC020347 · NIDCD · VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER · PI BERG, KATELYN · 2022 to 2024
$218k
NICHD NIH HHS P50 HD103537NIDCD NIH HHS F32 DC020347NIDCD NIH HHS R01 DC009404NIDCD NIH HHS R01 DC014037NIDCD NIH HHS R01 DC014462
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This prospective study investigated the potential benefits of deactivating the second most apical electrode to improve access to lower-frequency pitch and first formant information to help improve speech and music outcomes with a cochlear implant. Twenty-one adults (30 ears) with cochlear implants completed an A-B-A-B study to compare the participant's clinical map with all electrodes active (A) and their clinical map with the second most apical electrode deactivated (B). Test measures included pitch discrimination, speech understanding in noise, and subjective musical sound quality and enjoyment ratings. This study also investigated the impact of participant demographic and electrode placement factors on the degree of benefit derived from the experimental map (B). There was no significant difference between the two conditions on any measure at the group level. However, individual participants demonstrated improvements in pitch discrimination (33.3%), speech perception in noise (43.3%), musical sound quality (50.0%), and musical enjoyment (40.0%). Musical sound quality and enjoyment ratings were strongly correlated, and speech perception correlated with musical enjoyment but not sound quality. Electrodes outside scala tympani, smaller electrode-to-modiolus distances, and certain device manufacturers (Cochlear and MED-EL) predicted greater benefit from deactivating the second-most apical electrode. Certain adult cochlear implant users may benefit from selective apical electrode deactivation, depending on their demographic and electrode placement profile. Clinicians could consider deactivating the second most apical electrode with patients, who report poor musical sound quality or those who have disengaged from music since receiving their CI to assess potential benefits individually.

Indexed as

Cochlear ImplantationCochlear ImplantsPersons with Hearing DisabilitiesAcoustic StimulationAdultAgedAged, 80 and overFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedMusicNoisePitch DiscriminationPitch PerceptionPleasurecochlear implantcomputerized tomographyelectrode deactivationmusic perceptionspeech perception

Identifiers

PMID40607992
PMCPMC12227882

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.