ArticleTrends in hearing
Evaluating Selective Apical Electrode Deactivation for Improving Cochlear Implant Outcomes.
Article in Trends in hearing. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Music Therapy Outcomes in Older Adults Using Cochlear Implants, Hearing Aids, or Combined Bimodal Devices: A Systematic Review.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
This prospective study investigated the potential benefits of deactivating the second most apical electrode to improve access to lower-frequency pitch and first formant information to help improve speech and music outcomes with a cochlear implant. Twenty-one adults (30 ears) with cochlear implants completed an A-B-A-B study to compare the participant's clinical map with all electrodes active (A) and their clinical map with the second most apical electrode deactivated (B). Test measures included pitch discrimination, speech understanding in noise, and subjective musical sound quality and enjoyment ratings. This study also investigated the impact of participant demographic and electrode placement factors on the degree of benefit derived from the experimental map (B). There was no significant difference between the two conditions on any measure at the group level. However, individual participants demonstrated improvements in pitch discrimination (33.3%), speech perception in noise (43.3%), musical sound quality (50.0%), and musical enjoyment (40.0%). Musical sound quality and enjoyment ratings were strongly correlated, and speech perception correlated with musical enjoyment but not sound quality. Electrodes outside scala tympani, smaller electrode-to-modiolus distances, and certain device manufacturers (Cochlear and MED-EL) predicted greater benefit from deactivating the second-most apical electrode. Certain adult cochlear implant users may benefit from selective apical electrode deactivation, depending on their demographic and electrode placement profile. Clinicians could consider deactivating the second most apical electrode with patients, who report poor musical sound quality or those who have disengaged from music since receiving their CI to assess potential benefits individually.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.