Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40607886›Full record

ArticleJournal of vision2025

The pupil response to perceptual switches: What happens when you ignore them.

Bobicheng Zhang, Vasilii Marshev, Jan W Brascamp

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of vision, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Bobicheng ZhangDepartment of Psychology, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI, USA.
Vasilii MarshevDepartment of Psychology, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI, USA.
Jan W BrascampDepartment of Psychology, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The pupil has been found to dilate after switches in bistable perception, prompting the suggestion that norepinephrine-based neuromodulation plays a causal role in those switches. However, the pupil dilates in response to task-relevant events in general, and, in existing work, perceptual switches were typically task-relevant (e.g., they had to be reported). As such, observed switch-related dilations may have reflected nonspecific task relevance rather than switch-specific processes. Here, we measured pupil responses to perceptual switches that were task-irrelevant. Observers viewed a rotating structure-from-motion sphere consisting of equilateral triangles that inverted at semi-random intervals. In separate conditions, observers either reported perceptual switches (rendering them task-relevant) or reported changes in the triangles' orientation (rendering the switches task-irrelevant). We then used observers' optokinetic nystagmus to infer perceptual switch moments, even when observers did not report them. Control analyses confirm the reliability of this method. We found that task-relevant switches were followed by pupil dilations, but task-irrelevant ones were not. These results suggest that pupil-associated neuromodulation, although closely linked to task-relevant events, may not have any specific tie with perceptual bistability. These results are consistent with results we recently reported for binocular rivalry, indicating commonality across distinct forms of perceptual bistability.

Indexed as

AttentionMotion PerceptionPupilAdultFemaleHumansMaleNystagmus, OptokineticPhotic StimulationYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID40607886
PMCPMC12236628

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.