ArticleJournal of vision2025
The effects of simulated central and peripheral vision loss on naturalistic search.
Article in Journal of vision, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Pedestrian Collision Detection and Avoidance in Cerebral Visual Impairment During Unrestricted Walking in an Immersive Virtual Reality Environment.Research square · 2026Article
- Spatial Learning in Naturalistic Search With Simulated Vision Loss.Translational vision science & technology · 2026Article
- Head and Eye Movements During Pedestrian Crossing in Patients with Visual Impairment: A Virtual Reality Eye Tracking Study.Journal of eye movement research · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Worldwide, millions of people experience central or peripheral vision loss. The consequences on daily visual functioning are not completely known, in particular because previous studies lacked real-life representativeness. Our aim was to examine the effects of simulated central or peripheral impairment on a range of measures underlying performance in a naturalistic visual search task in a three-dimensional (3D) environment. The task was performed in a 3D virtual reality (VR) supermarket environment while being seated in a swivel chair. We used gaze-contingent masks to simulate vision loss. Participants were allocated to one of three conditions: full vision, central vision loss (a 6° mask), or peripheral vision loss (a 6° aperture) in a between-subject design. Each participant performed four search sequences, each consisting of four target products from a memorized shopping list, under varying contrast levels. Besides search time and accuracy, we tracked navigational, oculomotor, head and torso movements to assess which cognitive and motor components contributed to performance differences. Results showed increased task completion times with simulated central and peripheral vision loss, but more so with peripheral loss. With central vision loss, navigation was less efficient and it took longer to verify targets. Furthermore, participants made more and shorter fixations. With peripheral vision loss, navigation was even less efficient, and it took longer to find and verify a target. Additionally, saccadic amplitudes were reduced. Low contrast particularly affected search with peripheral vision loss. Memory failure, indicating cognitive load, did not differ between conditions. Thus we demonstrate that simulations of central and peripheral vision loss lead to differential search profiles in a naturalistic 3D environment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.