Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40607885›Full record

ArticleJournal of vision2025

The effects of simulated central and peripheral vision loss on naturalistic search.

Kirsten Veerkamp, Daniel Müller, Gwyneth A Pechler, David L Mann, Christian N L Olivers

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of vision, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Spatial Learning in Naturalistic Search With Simulated Vision Loss.Translational vision science & technology · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Kirsten VeerkampAmsterdam Movement Sciences & Institute for Brain and Behavior Amsterdam, Department of Human Movement Sciences, Faculty of Behavioural and Movement Sciences, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Daniel MüllerAmsterdam Movement Sciences & Institute for Brain and Behavior Amsterdam, Department of Human Movement Sciences, Faculty of Behavioural and Movement Sciences, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Gwyneth A PechlerInstitute for Brain and Behavior Amsterdam, Department of Experimental and Applied Psychology, Faculty of Behavioural and Movement Sciences, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
David L MannAmsterdam Movement Sciences & Institute for Brain and Behavior Amsterdam, Department of Human Movement Sciences, Faculty of Behavioural and Movement Sciences, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Christian N L OliversInstitute for Brain and Behavior Amsterdam, Department of Experimental and Applied Psychology, Faculty of Behavioural and Movement Sciences, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Worldwide, millions of people experience central or peripheral vision loss. The consequences on daily visual functioning are not completely known, in particular because previous studies lacked real-life representativeness. Our aim was to examine the effects of simulated central or peripheral impairment on a range of measures underlying performance in a naturalistic visual search task in a three-dimensional (3D) environment. The task was performed in a 3D virtual reality (VR) supermarket environment while being seated in a swivel chair. We used gaze-contingent masks to simulate vision loss. Participants were allocated to one of three conditions: full vision, central vision loss (a 6° mask), or peripheral vision loss (a 6° aperture) in a between-subject design. Each participant performed four search sequences, each consisting of four target products from a memorized shopping list, under varying contrast levels. Besides search time and accuracy, we tracked navigational, oculomotor, head and torso movements to assess which cognitive and motor components contributed to performance differences. Results showed increased task completion times with simulated central and peripheral vision loss, but more so with peripheral loss. With central vision loss, navigation was less efficient and it took longer to verify targets. Furthermore, participants made more and shorter fixations. With peripheral vision loss, navigation was even less efficient, and it took longer to find and verify a target. Additionally, saccadic amplitudes were reduced. Low contrast particularly affected search with peripheral vision loss. Memory failure, indicating cognitive load, did not differ between conditions. Thus we demonstrate that simulations of central and peripheral vision loss lead to differential search profiles in a naturalistic 3D environment.

Indexed as

Visual FieldsAdultEye MovementsFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedVirtual RealityYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID40607885
PMCPMC12236627

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.