ArticleJournal of vision2025
Exploring the role of serial dependence in visual time perception.
Article in Journal of vision, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Psychometric functions for temporal discrimination: Duration or log duration?Behavior research methods · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Serial dependence biases current perception based on recent experiences, creating continuity in subjective experience. Although extensively studied in vision across tasks such as numerosity, orientation discrimination, and attractiveness, its effect on visual time perception remains partially unexplored. Here, we investigated serial dependence in visual temporal perception, using two common tasks: temporal interval duration discrimination and temporal reproduction. In the discrimination task, participants judged whether the second of three visual stimuli was longer or shorter than the third, with the first stimulus being irrelevant, to induce serial dependence on the second stimulus. In the temporal reproduction task, participants were asked to reproduce an interval presented between two visual stimuli by pressing a button. Given the debate concerning the origin of the serial dependence effect and possible relation with memory processing, we also investigated the relationship between serial dependence and working memory capacity using a Corsi test. Our results showed that serial dependence does occur in visual time perception, but no relationship was found between the effect of the two tasks and memory retention capacity. The lack of correlation between serial dependence effects suggests that different processes may be involved in serial dependence across the two types of tasks.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.