ReviewEpigenomics2025
Mediators of maternal intergenerational epigenetic inheritance in mammals.
Review in Epigenomics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Epigenetic Regulation of Imprinted Genes in the Neurodevelopment of Offspring Born to Women with Preeclampsia: A Review.International journal of women's health · 2026Review
- Epigenetic mechanisms in maternal-fetal crosstalk: inter- and trans-generational inheritance.Epigenomics · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Experimental models and epidemiological data suggest that environmental factors, for example, adverse nutrition prior to conception, can lead to phenotypes in offspring of exposed parents in the absence of continued exposure. As a result these phenotypes have been described as epigentically inherited. The mechanistic basis for such phenomena has not been established in most cases. In this review, we consider possible contributing mechanisms for environmentaly induced epigenetic inheritance, with a focus on maternally transmitted effects and by comparing to paradigms of epigenetic inheritance with a clear mechanistic understanding. Genomic imprinting has provided an important conceptual framework for how the epigenetic states of parental germlines can determine allelic expression in offspring, yet, generally speaking, imprinted genes appear resilient to epigenetic disruption from altered parental environments. Metastable epialleles are environmentally sensitive and variably expressed loci that can impact organism phenotype, but the nature of any epigenetic marker at these loci transferred to offspring is unclear. Studies of examples across these forms of epigenetic inheritance show predominant effects are mediated by oocyte factors involved inreprogramming of the genome post-fertilization, rather than direct effects on gametic DNA methylation, with the exception of genomic imprinting. The potential contribution of additional oocyte chromatin features to the specific liability of phenotypic effector genes and their potential to persist through this reprogramming, however, remains to be investigated.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.