Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40607706›Full record

ArticleAnnals of surgery2025

Imaging-based Surgical Site Infection Detection Using Artificial Intelligence.

Hala Muaddi, Ashok Choudhary, Frank Lee, Stephanie S Anderson, Elizabeth Habermann, David Etzioni, Sarah McLaughlin, Michael Kendrick, Hojjat Salehinejad, Cornelius Thiels

Abstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in Annals of surgery, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Hala MuaddiDivision of Hepatobiliary and Pancreas Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN.ORCID 0000-0001-9721-2808
Ashok ChoudharyKern Center for the Science of Health Care Delivery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN.
Frank LeeDivision of Hepatobiliary and Pancreas Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN.
Stephanie S AndersonKern Center for the Science of Health Care Delivery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN.
Elizabeth HabermannKern Center for the Science of Health Care Delivery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN.
David EtzioniDivision of Colon and Rectal Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, AZ.
Sarah McLaughlinDivision of Surgical Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, FL.
Michael KendrickDivision of Hepatobiliary and Pancreas Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN.
Hojjat SalehinejadKern Center for the Science of Health Care Delivery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN.
Cornelius ThielsDivision of Hepatobiliary and Pancreas Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo develop an artificial intelligence-based pipeline to assess and triage patient-submitted postoperative wound images.

backgroundThe rise of outpatient surgeries, remote monitoring, and patient-submitted wound images via online portals has contributed to a growing administrative workload on clinicians. Early identification of surgical site infection (SSI) is essential for reducing postoperative morbidity.

methodsPatients ≥18 years old who underwent surgery at 9 affiliated Mayo Clinic hospitals (2019-2022) and were captured by the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (NSQIP) were included. Eligibility required submission of one image via the patient portal within 30 days after surgery. Images were independently screened in duplicate to determine the presence of an incision. SSI outcomes were obtained from NSQIP. The developed model consisted of 2 stages: incision detection and SSI detection in images with incisions. Four pretrained architectures were evaluated using 10-fold cross-validation, with upsampling and data augmentation to mitigate class imbalance. An end-to-end pipeline, image quality assessment and sensitivity analysis stratified by race were also performed.

resultsAmong 6060 patients, the median age was 54 years (interquartile range: 40-65), 61.4% (n=3805) were female, and 92.5% (n=5731) identified as White. SSIs were confirmed in 6.2% (n=386) images. Vision Transformer outperformed all others, achieving an incision detection accuracy of 0.94 (area under the curve=0.98) and an SSI detection accuracy of 0.73 (area under the curve=0.81). In addition, it demonstrated strong performance in assessing image quality. Sensitivity analysis revealed comparable performance across racial subgroups.

conclusionThis artificial intelligence pipeline demonstrates promising performance in automating wound image assessment and SSI detection, reducing clinical workload and improving postoperative care.

Indexed as

Artificial IntelligenceSurgical Wound InfectionAdultAgedFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedQuality Improvementartificial intelligencepostoperative monitoringsurgical site infection

Identifiers

PMID40607706
PMCPMC12341749

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.