ArticleThe Laryngoscope2025
Impact of Mask Type on Pharyngeal Opening Pressures During Drug-Induced Sleep Endoscopy.
Article in The Laryngoscope, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Impact of Mask Type on Pharyngeal Opening Pressures During Drug-Induced Sleep Endoscopy.The Laryngoscope · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivePositive airway pressure applied during drug-induced sleep endoscopy (DISE-PAP) can aid in surgical planning for the management of obstructive sleep apnea (OSA). Studies examining the effect of mask type during DISE-PAP are currently limited. Based on prior literature, we hypothesize that patients undergoing DISE-PAP with nasal masks will experience reduced pharyngeal opening pressures (PhOPs) compared to full-face mask techniques.
methodsAdult patients undergoing DISE-PAP with three mask types (nasal, full-face, and full-face masks with mouth closure and teeth in occlusion) from April 2024 to November 2024 were retrospectively reviewed. PhOPs (cmH
resultsFifty-six patients met the inclusion criteria. Median PhOP significantly differed for nasal, full-face, and full-face masks with mouth closure and teeth occlusion, respectively, at the velum (6 vs. 10 vs. 7.5 cmH
conclusionNasal masks led to reduced PhOP levels compared to full-face masks during DISE-PAP. Further study of DISE-PAP mask techniques is necessary given the recent association of PhOP with patient characteristics and sleep surgery success. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 3:
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.