ArticleEnvironmental science & technology2025
Developing Nationwide Estimates of Built Environment Quality Characteristics Using Street-View Imagery and Computer Vision.
Article in Environmental science & technology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Environmental health studies commonly rely on urban composition measures for built environment exposure assessment. However, quality measures are equally important, as they directly influence health behaviors. We leveraged computer vision and street-view imagery to estimate five components of built environment quality (perceived beauty, relaxation potential, nature quality, safe for walking, and safety from crime) across all U.S. cities, explicitly addressing socio-demographic and temporal biases. We collected 72 516 surveys via Amazon Mechanical Turk, where participants ranked street-view images and provided socio-demographic data. Deep learning models predicted quality metrics at 120 million street locations for 2008, 2012, 2016, and 2020. Cross-validation accuracy ranged from 73% (nature quality) to 59% (safety from crime) compared to 50% expected by random chance. Adjusting sampling weights based on demographics reduced but did not eliminate biases for Hispanic/Latino and Native Hawaiian or Pacific Islander groups (3.5 and 4% lower accuracy, respectively). We also adjusted model predictions for seasonal biases, correcting higher scores from late spring and early summer imagery (
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.