Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40607612›Full record

ArticleThe New phytologist2025

Alleviation of water-deficit inhibition of plant growth by rhizosphere microbiota conditioning.

Victor Angot, Clémence Thiour-Mauprivez, Romain Schellenberger, Mickaël Lamboeuf, Olivier Crépin, Dominique Garmyn, Manuel Blouin, Samuel Jacquiod

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The New phytologist, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Victor AngotUMR Agroécologie Dijon, Université de Bourgogne Europe, Institut Agro Dijon, INRAE, 17 rue de Sully, Dijon, 21065, France.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0000-8998-1295
Clémence Thiour-MauprivezUMR Agroécologie Dijon, Université de Bourgogne Europe, Institut Agro Dijon, INRAE, 17 rue de Sully, Dijon, 21065, France.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7787-7511
Romain SchellenbergerUMR Agroécologie Dijon, Université de Bourgogne Europe, Institut Agro Dijon, INRAE, 17 rue de Sully, Dijon, 21065, France.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4036-7806
Mickaël LamboeufUMR Agroécologie Dijon, Université de Bourgogne Europe, Institut Agro Dijon, INRAE, 17 rue de Sully, Dijon, 21065, France.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6173-4011
Olivier CrépinUMR Agroécologie Dijon, Université de Bourgogne Europe, Institut Agro Dijon, INRAE, 17 rue de Sully, Dijon, 21065, France.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0007-7486-0993
Dominique GarmynUMR Agroécologie Dijon, Université de Bourgogne Europe, Institut Agro Dijon, INRAE, 17 rue de Sully, Dijon, 21065, France.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4693-6026
Manuel BlouinUMR Agroécologie Dijon, Université de Bourgogne Europe, Institut Agro Dijon, INRAE, 17 rue de Sully, Dijon, 21065, France.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3928-9070
Samuel JacquiodUMR Agroécologie Dijon, Université de Bourgogne Europe, Institut Agro Dijon, INRAE, 17 rue de Sully, Dijon, 21065, France.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0713-7996

Funding

Agence Nationale de la Recherche, Programme Investissements d'avenir ANR-11-INBS-0012University of Bourgogne Franche-Comté via an ISITE-BFC International Junior Fellowship Award
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Rhizosphere microbiota conditioning is a promising strategy to enhance plant growth. We conditioned the rhizosphere microbiota of Brassica juncea to water deficit to assess its impact on plant growth. In a glasshouse, plants were first grown under well-watered conditions, then exposed to moderate (MD, pF = 2.3) or extreme (ED, pF = 3.5) water deficits. We extracted and inoculated the rhizosphere microbiota to new plants and repeated this process 10 times. Control plants were kept well-watered. We monitored changes in plant phenotypes and in rhizosphere microbial communities (bacteria and eukaryotes). The initial water-deficit growth inhibition of plants was successfully alleviated by 19.3% in MD and 29.4% in ED after conditioning (MD: from -35.6% to -16.3%; ED: from -56.8% to -27.4%). This beneficial effect on plants was not observed during the well-watered phases, suggesting an active role of the microbiota when water became scarce. The increase in plant growth correlated with aggregated rhizosphere soil and significantly matched changes in the bacterial community, featuring reduced diversity and increased biofilm production capacity along the conditioning process. We showed that microbiota conditioning was a fast and efficient way to achieve better plant growth under adverse conditions, likely via the adaptation capabilities of the rhizosphere bacterial community.

Indexed as

MicrobiotaMustard PlantPlant DevelopmentRhizosphereWaterBacteriaBiofilmsPhenotypePlant RootsSoil MicrobiologyWaterbiofilmdroughtexperimental evolutionplant growth promotionrhizosphere microbiomerhizosphere microbiota

Identifiers

PMID40607612
PMCPMC12371179

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.