Observational studyCancer medicine2025
Occupational Disparities in Cancer Survival Among the Working Population in Japan: 10-Year Survival Analysis Using the Kanagawa Cancer Registry.
Observational study in Cancer medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundLimited data exist on occupational disparities in long-term cancer mortality among the working-age population in Japan. We examined occupational disparities in long-term cancer survival, focusing on 10-year survival outcomes among working-age populations.
methodsThis retrospective observational study used data from the Kanagawa Cancer Registry of 41,632 patients with cancer aged 20-65 years who were diagnosed between 1992 and 2015, with a 10-year follow-up. Patients were classified into four occupational classes based on their longest-held occupations (upper nonmanual, lower nonmanual, manual, and primary industry). The primary outcome was all-cause mortality, and cancer-specific mortality was the secondary outcome. Poisson regression was used to estimate the mortality rate ratios (MRRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for each occupational class, adjusted for sex, age, and year of diagnosis. Additional analyses were performed for common cancer sites (stomach, lung, colorectal, and breast).
resultsMRRs for all-cause mortality were higher in lower nonmanual (MRR = 1.14, 95% CI 1.10-1.18), manual (MRR = 1.38, 95% CI 1.32-1.43), and primary industry workers (MRR = 1.19, 95% CI 1.09-1.31) than in upper nonmanual workers (professional and managerial occupations). Similar patterns were observed across common cancer sites and cancer-specific mortality. Adjusting for cancer stage and treatment attenuated these disparities but did not eliminate them, particularly among manual workers.
conclusionsWe observed occupational disparities in long-term cancer mortality among working-age populations in Japan, with manual workers experiencing worse survival outcomes. Promoting targeted interventions, healthy lifestyles, and early cancer detection for cancer survivors in the workplace are crucial for mitigating these disparities.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.