ArticleIJU case reports2025
Adult Manifestation of Lower Urinary Tract Dysfunction as Daytime Urinary Incontinence and Nocturnal Enuresis in a Case With Spinal Lipoma.
Article in IJU case reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Generally, lower urinary tract function is considered to show few changes in adulthood for cases of spina bifida. Case Presentation: The case involved a 33-year-old man with a primary diagnosis of spinal lipoma. Urological management by spontaneous voiding was maintained, and uroflowmetry at 23 years old showed a maximum flow rate of 9.6 mL/s and a residual urine volume of 35 mL; then urological follow-up was ended. The patient developed nocturnal enuresis and daytime urinary incontinence. Residual urine was exceeding 500 mL. Bladder deformity was identified on VCUG. UDS showed a high storage pressure with compliance of 5.0 mL/cmH Conclusion: Patients managed by spontaneous voiding should be carefully evaluated for atypical UDS findings to decide whether urological follow-up can be considered complete.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.