ReviewFrontiers in artificial intelligence2025
Machine learning applications in the analysis of sedentary behavior and associated health risks.
Review in Frontiers in artificial intelligence, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- DEPP: A diabetes exercise prescription protocol knowledge base.PLOS digital health · 2026Article
- Transformer-Based Clinical Annotation of Lung Cancer Reports: A Benchmark and Fine-Tuning Study on a Novel Tunisian Corpus.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Ubiquitous Non-Wearable Sensor for Human Sedentary Behavior Monitoring and Characterization.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Validating the Longitudinal Assessment of Sedentary Behavior in a Randomized Controlled Trial via a Deep Learning Algorithm.Journal for the measurement of physical behaviour · 2026Article
- Toward autonomous artificial intelligence agents in sports science: a modular framework for development, validation, and implementation.Biology of sport · 2026Review
- Review
- Generative artificial intelligence and large language models in sports medicine: a scoping review of applications, accuracy, and ethical implications.Frontiers in public health · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: The rapid advancement of technology has brought numerous benefits to public health but has also contributed to a rise in sedentary lifestyles, linked to various health issues. As prolonged inactivity becomes a growing public health concern, researchers are increasingly utilizing machine learning (ML) techniques to examine and understand these patterns. ML offers powerful tools for analyzing large datasets and identifying trends in physical activity and inactivity, generating insights that can support effective interventions. Objectives: This review aims to: (i) examine the role of ML in analyzing sedentary patterns, (ii) explore how different ML techniques can be optimized to improve the accuracy of predicting sedentary behavior, and (iii) assess strategies to enhance the effectiveness of ML algorithms. Methods: A comprehensive search was conducted in PubMed and Scopus, targeting peer-reviewed articles published between 2004 and 2024. The search included the subject terms "sedentary behavior," "sedentary lifestyle health," and "machine learning sedentary lifestyle," combined with the keywords "physical inactivity" and "diseases" using Boolean operators (AND, OR). Articles were included if they addressed the health impacts of sedentary behavior or employed ML techniques for its analysis. Exclusion criteria involved studies older than 20 years or lacking direct relevance. After screening 33 core articles and identifying 13 more through citation tracking, 46 articles were included in the final review. Results: This narrative review describes the characteristics of sedentary behavior, associated health risks, and the applications of ML in this context. Based on the reviewed literature, sedentary behavior was consistently associated with cardiovascular disease, metabolic disorders, and mental health conditions. The review highlights the utility of various ML approaches in classifying activity levels and significantly improving the prediction of sedentary behavior, offering a promising approach to address this widespread health issue. Conclusion: ML algorithms, including supervised and unsupervised models, show great potential in accurately detecting and predicting sedentary behavior. When integrated with wearable sensor data and validated in real-world settings, these models can enhance the scalability and precision of AI-driven interventions. Such advancements support personalized health strategies and could help lower healthcare costs linked to physical inactivity, ultimately improving public health outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.