ArticleJournal of pediatrics. Clinical practice2025
Intrafacility Neonatal Intensive Care Unit to Pediatric Intensive Care Unit Transfer in the United States: A Pediatric Health Information Systems Registry Study.
Article in Journal of pediatrics. Clinical practice, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Neonatal Intensive Care Unit to Pediatric Intensive Care Unit Transfers: A Critical Juncture in the Trajectory of Neonatal Critical Illness.Journal of pediatrics. Clinical practice · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: To describe and trend the frequency of intrafacility neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) to pediatric intensive care unit (PICU) transfers among the US children's hospitals and evaluate potential relationships between patient characteristics, transfer timing, and post-transfer outcomes. Study design: We conducted a multicenter retrospective cohort study from 2016 to 2022 of children undergoing intrafacility NICU to PICU transfers using diagnosis and procedure codes from the Pediatric Health Information Systems database. Primary study outcomes were as follows: (1) intrafacility transfer rate, (2) patient age at transfer, and (3) post-transfer length of stay (LOS). Clinical features were assessed for association with transfer age and post-transfer LOS. Results: A total of 4.98% of NICU encounters underwent PICU transfer. Rates did not increase significantly over time (annual range 4.21%-5.40%) with a bimodal distribution peaking among those <10 (41.2%) and >100 days (20.5%) old. Those transferred at an older chronological age (ie, fifth quintile-median of 183 days [IQR: 135-271]) more frequently had tracheostomy (40.2% vs 2.5%) and history of cardiopulmonary resuscitation (7.8% vs 3.9%), and less frequently experienced extracorporeal life support (16.8% vs 3.4%) and parenteral nutrition (76.5% vs 60.8%) than a younger age (ie, first quintile-median age 1 day [IQR: 0-1]) (all Conclusions: Annual intrafacility NICU to PICU transfer rates ranged between 4.21% and 5.4% occurring most frequently among neonates aged <10 and >100 days. Post-transfer LOS and timing of transfer were associated with markers of medical complexity, emphasizing the importance of optimizing multidisciplinary handover and minimizing transfer-related morbidity.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.