ArticleFrontiers in immunology2025
CAR-T cell therapy for glioblastoma: insight from mathematical modeling.
Article in Frontiers in immunology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Informing development of brain cancer therapies within "preclinical trials" using ex vivo patient tumors.Advanced drug delivery reviews · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Glioblastoma is a rare, aggressive brain tumor marked by high therapeutic resistance, poor prognosis, and limited treatment options. Emerging immunotherapies, particularly Chimeric Antigen Receptor (CAR) T-cell therapy, offer promising alternatives to standard care. However, adapting CAR-T cell strategies from hematologic malignancies to solid tumors like glioblastoma presents substantial challenges. Methods: We extended existing mathematical models to investigate glioblastoma treatment dynamics with CAR-T cell therapy. Simulations were based on clinical trial-inspired scenarios targeting IL13Rα2, HER2, and EGFRvIII antigens, assessing both single-dose and cyclic dosing regimens. The models incorporated key biological processes, including tumor growth, CAR-T cell proliferation delays, and resistance mechanisms. Results: Cyclic CAR-T cell administration outperformed single-dose strategies in reducing tumor burden. Incorporating resistance and treatment delays into the models provided critical insights into relapse dynamics and therapeutic durability. Discussion: This study presents a comprehensive modeling framework for CAR-T cell therapy in glioblastoma, highlighting the importance of dosing regimens and resistance dynamics. The findings offer valuable guidance for optimizing therapeutic strategies to enhance patient outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.