Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40607374›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in surgery2025

Hybrid laparoscopic repair of complex abdominal wall hernias with transabdominal partially extraperitoneal mesh fixation: preliminary results.

Sarah Mahmood, Yusuf Moollan, Sarit S Badiani, Christophe R Berney

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in surgery, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Sarah MahmoodDepartment of Surgery, Bankstown-Lidcombe Hospital, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
Yusuf MoollanDepartment of Surgery, Bankstown-Lidcombe Hospital, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
Sarit S BadianiFaculty of Medicine, University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
Christophe R BerneyDepartment of Surgery, Bankstown-Lidcombe Hospital, Sydney, NSW, Australia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: There are two conventional approaches to abdominal wall hernia repairs that aim to achieve anatomical restoration. Open approaches have the advantage of complete hernial sac excision with freedom of mesh placement. In comparison, the advantages of the laparoscopic approach involve shorter hospital stays, less postoperative pain, and fewer postoperative complications. More recently, the hybrid approach, which combines the two techniques, has gained popularity as a way to potentially reap the benefits of both. Our aim was to determine whether this hybrid approach can achieve the same benefits, irrespective of hernia size, age, and body mass index (BMI). Primary outcome of interest was hernia recurrence. Secondary outcomes included postoperative complications, pain, and quality of life (QoL). Method: Medical records of all patients who underwent hybrid laparoscopic hernia repair (HLHR) with transabdominal partially extraperitoneal (TAPE) mesh fixation between 2017 and 2023 were retrieved from a prospectively maintained institutional database and retrospectively analyzed. Intra- and postoperative complications, as well as hernia recurrence, were recorded. QoL was assessed using the Carolinas Comfort Scale (CCS). Results: There were 37 patients (21 women, 56.8%) with a mean age of 66 years and BMI of 34.2 kg/m Conclusions: HLHR with TAPE mesh fixation is safe, with satisfactory mid- to long-term outcomes, irrespective of hernia size and BMI.

Indexed as

hybrid hernia repairincisional herniameshquality of lifetapeventral hernia

Identifiers

PMID40607374
PMCPMC12213775

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.