ArticleFrontiers in surgery2025
Analysis of the risk difference in post-spinal anesthesia hypotension between primiparas and multiparas in cesarean section.
Article in Frontiers in surgery, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Prediction of spinal anesthesia-induced hypotension during cesarean delivery: a narrative review.Journal of anesthesia, analgesia and critical care · 2026Review
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: This study aimed to investigate the impact of maternal type and its interactions on the incidence of hypotension following spinal anesthesia. Methods: In this retrospective cohort study, both primiparous and multiparous women were included. Demographic, pregnancy-related, and hemodynamic data were collected. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses were performed to evaluate the association between these factors and the occurrence of hypotension after spinal anesthesia. Additionally, multivariate models with and without maternal type were constructed, followed by interaction analysis. Results: Primiparous women had a lower median age and slightly greater weight gain during pregnancy compared to multiparous women. They also exhibited significantly higher pleth variability index (PVI) and heart rate (HR), while heart rate variability (HRV) was significantly lower. Univariate regression analysis identified maternal type, age, weight gain during pregnancy, estimated fetal weight, PVI, HR, HRV, and systolic blood pressure (SBP) as significant predictors of hypotension. Multivariate model analysis showed that adding the variable of parity significantly improved the model's ability to discriminate the occurrence of hypotension (Model 2 AUC = 0.815 vs. Model 1 AUC = 0.740). Interaction analysis revealed significant interactions between heart rate variability (HRV), systolic blood pressure (SBP), gestational weight gain, and parity, suggesting that these physiological characteristics are more strongly associated with hypotension in primiparas. Discussion: In conclusion, primiparous women are at significantly higher risk of developing hypotension after spinal anesthesia than multiparous women. Baseline perfusion index (PI), estimated fetal weight, and baseline PVI are key contributing factors to this outcome.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.