Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40607303›Full record

ArticleAnnals of gastroenterological surgery2025

Institutional learning curve and factors of prolonged operation time of robotic distal pancreatectomy: An analysis of an initial 117 cases.

Yuki Hirata, Laura Prakash, Jess Maxwell, Rebecca Snyder, Michael Kim, Hop Tran Cao, Ching-Wei D Tzeng, Jefferey E Lee, Matthew H G Katz, Naruhiko Ikoma

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Annals of gastroenterological surgery, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Short-Term Outcomes and Cost of Robotic Versus Open Distal Pancreatectomy During the Initial Phase of a Robotic Pancreatectomy Program.Annals of surgery open : perspectives of surgical history, education, and clinical approaches · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Yuki HirataDepartment of Surgery National Hospital Organization Tokyo Medical Center Tokyo Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0283-6392
Laura PrakashDepartment of Surgical Oncology The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center Houston Texas USA.
Jess MaxwellDepartment of Surgical Oncology The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center Houston Texas USA.
Rebecca SnyderDepartment of Surgical Oncology The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center Houston Texas USA.
Michael KimDepartment of Surgical Oncology The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center Houston Texas USA.
Hop Tran CaoDepartment of Surgical Oncology The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center Houston Texas USA.
Ching-Wei D TzengDepartment of Surgical Oncology The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center Houston Texas USA.
Jefferey E LeeDepartment of Surgical Oncology The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center Houston Texas USA.
Matthew H G KatzDepartment of Surgical Oncology The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center Houston Texas USA.
Naruhiko IkomaDepartment of Surgical Oncology The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center Houston Texas USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9825-9234

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: The granular methods by which centers can safely implement and effectively expand robotic distal pancreatectomy (RDP), including those related to appropriate patient selection during the learning curve period, remain unclear. This study aimed to verify that our strategic robotic surgical oncology program effectively implemented RDP as standard practice and to identify factors associated with prolonged operation time. Materials and Methods: We performed a detailed analysis of the intraoperative and short-term outcomes of consecutive patients (October 2018-September 2023) undergoing RDP at our center, beginning with the first patient in our program. Operation time was analyzed using a cumulative sum chart (CUSUM), and factors associated with prolonged operation time were analyzed. Results: Throughout the study period, five surgeons performed RDP for 117 patients. The CUSUM analysis indicated our center required 18 cases to overcome the initial learning phase and 43 additional cases to become proficient. In contrast, when comparing short-term outcomes across the three observation periods, there were no significant changes in the incidence of ACCORDION grade ≥3 pancreatic fistulas ( Conclusions: Although an institutional learning curve was observed, our program enabled the safe implementation of RDP and successfully expanded the number of primary operating surgeons while maintaining stable short-term outcomes. The absence of an impact of high BMI on operation time in female patients suggests a notable advantage of robotic approach for these individuals.

Indexed as

learning curvepancreatectomyrobotic pancreatectomy

Identifiers

PMID40607303
PMCPMC12211093

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.