Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40607293›Full record

ReviewAnnals of gastroenterological surgery2025

Short-term and long-term outcomes of self-expandable metallic stent placement versus creation of a diverting stoma for obstructive colorectal cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Thanakorn Yingruxpund, Akihisa Matsuda, Takeshi Yamada, Chaiya Chansai, Hiroshi Yoshida

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Annals of gastroenterological surgery, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Thanakorn YingruxpundDepartment of Gastroenterological Surgery Nippon Medical School Tokyo Japan.
Akihisa MatsudaDepartment of Gastroenterological Surgery Nippon Medical School Tokyo Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6468-9375
Takeshi YamadaDepartment of Gastroenterological Surgery Nippon Medical School Tokyo Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1436-7482
Chaiya ChansaiDepartment of Surgery Royal Thai Airforce Hospital (Sikan) Bangkok Thailand.
Hiroshi YoshidaDepartment of Gastroenterological Surgery Nippon Medical School Tokyo Japan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Aim: A diverting stoma (DS) is often used as a bridge to surgery in patients with obstructive colorectal cancer (OCRC). However, the self-expandable metallic stent (SEMS) has emerged as a less invasive option. This systematic review and meta-analysis compared the efficacy and safety of the SEMS with that of a DS for OCRC. Methods: An electronic literature search through to May 2024 was performed to identify studies that compared the SEMS and DS as a bridge to surgery in patients with OCRC. The primary outcomes were postoperative complications and mortality. Secondary outcomes included clinical success of decompression, surgical site infection, anastomotic leakage, bleeding, permanent stoma creation, locoregional recurrence, and 3-year overall survival. The data were pooled using a random-effects model. The results are presented as odds ratios (ORs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Results: Five non-randomized studies that included 977 patients (SEMS, Conclusion: Although clinical success was inferior to DS, SEMS contributed to comparable outcomes including postoperative complications, mortality, and long-term outcomes, but significantly reduced SSI. These findings support the broader adoption of SEMS in clinical practice, particularly requiring minimized invasiveness and improving patient quality of life are prioritized.

Indexed as

bridge to surgerydiverting stomaobstructive colorectal cancerself‐expandable metallic stent

Identifiers

PMID40607293
PMCPMC12211109

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.