ArticleAnnals of gastroenterological surgery2025
Regional and patient characteristic disparities in the outcomes of minimally invasive surgery for colorectal cancer in Japan.
Article in Annals of gastroenterological surgery, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Short-term outcomes of bridge-to-surgery using self-expanding metallic stents in robotic colorectal surgery for obstructive left-sided colorectal cancer: a consecutive cohort study.Surgical endoscopy · 2026Article
- Evolution of treatment patterns and survival outcomes in non-metastatic rectal cancer: a 15-year real-world single-center analysis.BMC cancer · 2026Article
- Regional and patient characteristic disparities in the outcomes of minimally invasive surgery for colorectal cancer in Japan.Annals of gastroenterological surgery · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Aim: The use of minimally invasive surgery, including laparoscopic and robotic surgery, for gastrointestinal cancer has been rapidly increasing. This study aimed to clarify whether differences in minimally invasive surgery outcomes are associated with regional and patient characteristics. Methods: A total of 123 771 right hemicolectomy and 126 965 low anterior resection cases performed between 2013 and 2019 were selected from the National Clinical Database for analysis. Patients were stratified by regional and economic variables, and open and minimally invasive surgical outcomes were evaluated. Results: In secondary medical regions characterized by urban settings and numerous designated cancer care hospitals, the observed 30-day mortality of low anterior resections was lower only in the minimally invasive surgery group. For right hemicolectomies in regions with many designated cancer care hospitals, the observed incidence of postoperative complications was also lower in the minimally invasive group. Residents of high-income areas undergoing low anterior resection had a lower frequency of 30-day reoperation regardless of the type of surgery and a lower 30-day mortality in the minimally invasive group. For both right hemicolectomy and low anterior resection, patients with longer travel distances had fewer postoperative complications and lower 30-day reoperation rates in the minimally invasive group than in the open surgery group. Conclusion: This study found regional and patient characteristic disparities in minimally invasive surgical outcomes; national policies should be implemented to address these inequities.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.