ArticleAnnals of gastroenterological surgery2025
Clinical significance of preoperative Glasgow prognostic score in patients with colorectal cancer and synchronous peritoneal metastases.
Article in Annals of gastroenterological surgery, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Integration of objective nutritional status and tumor burden predicts 5-year survival after gastric cancer surgery: a multicenter real-world study.Surgical endoscopy · 2026Article
- Clinical significance of preoperative Glasgow prognostic score in patients with colorectal cancer and synchronous peritoneal metastases.Annals of gastroenterological surgery · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
32 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Chemotherapy is the typical choice for treating colorectal cancer with synchronous peritoneal metastases. Nonetheless, surgical resection may be chosen if the metastases are resectable. Unfortunately, there is no reliable preoperative or intraoperative prognostic indicator. This study aimed to determine the prognostic significance of the preoperative Glasgow prognostic score (GPS) in colorectal cancer patients with synchronous peritoneal metastases. Methods: We conducted a prospective study on 143 patients with colorectal cancer and concurrent peritoneal metastases. Our analysis included prognostic factors, such as the GPS, using data from the institutional observational study by the Japanese Society for Cancer of the Colon and Rectum. Results: The 3-year survival rates for the GPS0 or 1 and GPS2 groups were 32.7% and 14.3%, respectively, with a significantly worse prognosis in the GPS2 group ( Conclusions: Preoperative GPS2 is an independent poor prognostic factor in patients with colorectal cancer and synchronous peritoneal metastases, and surgical resection does not improve prognosis in patients with GPS2. Preoperative GPSs may be used as indicators for surgical resection of synchronous peritoneal metastases.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.