Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40607241›Full record

ReviewAJOG global reports2025

Bone mineral density changes during use of progestin-only contraceptives: a rapid review of recent evidence.

Blake Erhardt-Ohren, Ndola Prata, Scott Rosenblum

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in AJOG global reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Blake Erhardt-OhrenGlobal Impact Advisors (Erhardt-Ohren and Prata), School of Public Health University of California Berkeley, Redwood City, CA.
Ndola PrataGlobal Impact Advisors (Erhardt-Ohren and Prata), School of Public Health University of California Berkeley, Redwood City, CA.
Scott RosenblumGlobal Impact Advisors (Erhardt-Ohren, Prata and Rosenblum), Redwood City, CA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: The purpose of this paper is to consolidate existing evidence and identify knowledge and research gaps on the bone health effects of progestin-only oral contraception, injectables, hormonal intrauterine devices, and implants. implementation. Data sources: We searched PubMed, CINAHL, Web of Science, and The Cochrane Library for conference abstracts, original research articles, systematic reviews, and meta-analyses published between 05 May 2012 and 31 August 2023. Study eligibility criteria: We limited results to any study design published as a conference abstract, original research study, meta-analysis, or systematic review in English-language peer-reviewed journals. Study appraisal and synthesis methods: Two independent reviewers screened item titles. One reviewer read all abstracts and full papers, and a second reviewer confirmed alignment with a 5% sample of each. One reviewer extracted relevant information into Excel with a 5% sample review by another research team member. We reviewed the references for all included items and screened potentially relevant items in the same manner as described above. Subject matter experts contributed additional items. We assessed items using the Mixed Methods Appraisal tool. Results: The search strategy yielded 32 items, most of which explored the use of intra-muscular depot medroxyprogesterone acetate 150mg. We found a clear association between any use of depot medroxyprogesterone acetate and bone mineral density loss. This negative effect seems to be more common among younger women and women on antiretrovirals. There is, however, evidence to suggest that bone loss can be restored after depot medroxyprogesterone acetate discontinuation. Hormonal intrauterine device and implant users do not seem to experience bone mineral density loss. Conclusions: While there is a clear association between bone mineral density loss and depot medroxyprogesterone acetate injectable use, treatment during contraceptive use and bone health restoration following discontinuation are not adequately researched. In this review, we provide evidence that bone health can be partially or completely restored after depot medroxyprogesterone acetate discontinuation, identify opportunities to learn more about depot medroxyprogesterone acetate injectables and bone health during and after use, and find gaps in knowledge on potential associations between bone health and other progestin-only contraceptives.

Indexed as

Bone healthBone mineral densityContraceptionContraceptiveDepo Provera

Identifiers

PMID40607241
PMCPMC12213273

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.