ReviewAJOG global reports2025
Bone mineral density changes during use of progestin-only contraceptives: a rapid review of recent evidence.
Review in AJOG global reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Menstrual status and bone health in athletes from different sports - a retrospective analysis.BMC sports science, medicine & rehabilitation · 2026Article
- Analgesic and Anti-Inflammatory Activity of Ambroxol in the Treatment of Endometriosis: An Experimental Study in Wistar Rats.Pharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Medical Treatment for Endometriosis: One Size Does Not Fit All.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Review
- Endometriosis-associated bone loss: re-evaluating the potential role of systemic inflammation and hypoestrogenic therapies.Frontiers in global women's health · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: The purpose of this paper is to consolidate existing evidence and identify knowledge and research gaps on the bone health effects of progestin-only oral contraception, injectables, hormonal intrauterine devices, and implants. implementation. Data sources: We searched PubMed, CINAHL, Web of Science, and The Cochrane Library for conference abstracts, original research articles, systematic reviews, and meta-analyses published between 05 May 2012 and 31 August 2023. Study eligibility criteria: We limited results to any study design published as a conference abstract, original research study, meta-analysis, or systematic review in English-language peer-reviewed journals. Study appraisal and synthesis methods: Two independent reviewers screened item titles. One reviewer read all abstracts and full papers, and a second reviewer confirmed alignment with a 5% sample of each. One reviewer extracted relevant information into Excel with a 5% sample review by another research team member. We reviewed the references for all included items and screened potentially relevant items in the same manner as described above. Subject matter experts contributed additional items. We assessed items using the Mixed Methods Appraisal tool. Results: The search strategy yielded 32 items, most of which explored the use of intra-muscular depot medroxyprogesterone acetate 150mg. We found a clear association between any use of depot medroxyprogesterone acetate and bone mineral density loss. This negative effect seems to be more common among younger women and women on antiretrovirals. There is, however, evidence to suggest that bone loss can be restored after depot medroxyprogesterone acetate discontinuation. Hormonal intrauterine device and implant users do not seem to experience bone mineral density loss. Conclusions: While there is a clear association between bone mineral density loss and depot medroxyprogesterone acetate injectable use, treatment during contraceptive use and bone health restoration following discontinuation are not adequately researched. In this review, we provide evidence that bone health can be partially or completely restored after depot medroxyprogesterone acetate discontinuation, identify opportunities to learn more about depot medroxyprogesterone acetate injectables and bone health during and after use, and find gaps in knowledge on potential associations between bone health and other progestin-only contraceptives.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.