ArticleAJOG global reports2025
Performance of hysteroscopy in diagnosing chronic endometritis and the role of intra- and inter-observer variability: a prospective study of 70 cases.
Article in AJOG global reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Artificial Intelligence, Deep Learning, and Computer Vision in Hysteroscopy: A Systematic Review.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Pain determinants during office hysteroscopy: Insights from clinical and procedural factors: A nine-year prospective cohort study.Journal of Taibah University Medical Sciences · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Chronic endometritis (CE) is a persistent inflammation of the endometrium often implicated in female infertility. Histological examination with immunohistochemical (IHC) analysis of the plasma cell marker CD138 is the gold standard for diagnosing this condition. Methods: This prospective, multicentered, observational study was conducted from June 6, 2021, to August 8, 2022. We evaluated the diagnostic sensitivity and specificity of hysteroscopy (HSC) using the standardized criteria of Cicinelli et al, which include micro polyps, focal hyperemia, diffuse hyperemia, stromal edema, strawberry aspect, and hemorrhagic spots. We also assessed intra- and inter-observer variability in the hysteroscopic diagnosis of CE. Results: The prevalence of CE diagnosed by IHC analysis of CD138 expression was 42.9%. The performance of HSC in diagnosing CE was moderate, with a sensitivity of 47.5%, specificity of 64.38%, positive predictive value of 50%, and negative predictive value of 62.05%. The inter-observer agreement for hysteroscopic diagnosis of CE was strong ( Conclusion: HSC is not the examination of choice for diagnosing CE. An endometrial biopsy using the Novak curette with IHC analysis of CD138 expression is a more sensitive and less costly diagnostic method.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.