Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40607233›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in endocrinology2025

The risk of hyperuricemia assessed by estimated glucose disposal rate.

Zhaoxiang Wang, Ruoshuang Liu, Fengyan Tang, Yirong Shen

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in endocrinology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Zhaoxiang Wang *Department of Endocrinology, Affiliated Kunshan Hospital of Jiangsu University, Kunshan, Jiangsu, China.
Ruoshuang Liu *Department of Endocrinology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, Jiangsu, China.
Fengyan TangDepartment of Endocrinology, Affiliated Kunshan Hospital of Jiangsu University, Kunshan, Jiangsu, China.
Yirong ShenDepartment of Clinical Nutrition, Hangzhou Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose: The estimated glucose disposal rate (eGDR) is a simple and noninvasive clinical measure used to assess insulin resistance (IR), yet its potential utility as a marker for hyperuricemia risk had not been systematically evaluated. This study aimed to investigate the relationship between eGDR and hyperuricemia risk among American adults. Methods: Data for this cross-sectional study were obtained from the 2007-2018 National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES). Hyperuricemia was identified as a serum urate (SU) concentration of ≥7 mg/dL in males and ≥6 mg/dL in females. The relationship between eGDR and hyperuricemia risk was assessed using multivariate logistic regression and restricted cubic spline (RCS) methods, with additional subgroup and interaction analyses performed. Results: With increasing eGDR values, the prevalence of hyperuricemia decreased significantly (29.93% vs. 19.11% vs. 13.20% vs. 5.03%, Conclusions: The eGDR is inversely associated with hyperuricemia and appears to be a promising epidemiological tool for evaluating the impact of IR on the risk of hyperuricemia.

Indexed as

Blood GlucoseHyperuricemiaInsulin ResistanceAdultAgedCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedNutrition SurveysPrevalenceRisk FactorsUnited StatesUric AcidBlood GlucoseUric Acidestimated glucose disposal ratehyperuricemiainsulin resistanceNHANESpopulation-based study

Identifiers

PMID40607233
PMCPMC12213406

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.