ReviewInterventional cardiology (London, England)2025
Management of Coronary Artery Disease in the Context of Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Percutaneous Coronary Intervention Timing and an Algorithmic Approach to Management.
Review in Interventional cardiology (London, England), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Intensive care utilization and clinical outcomes after transcatheter aortic valve implantation: a nationwide observational study using the Japanese intensive care patient database.Heart and vessels · 2026Article
- Computed Tomography Coronary Angiography as a Gatekeeper for Invasive Coronary Assessment Before Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) is widely performed for severe aortic stenosis (AS), often accompanied by coronary artery disease (CAD). The optimal management of CAD in TAVI patients remains uncertain. This study reviews the evidence on percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) timing in TAVI, and proposes an algorithmic approach for CAD management. Methods: A comprehensive search of PubMed, EMBASE and Cochrane identified studies comparing PCI timing strategies in TAVI patients. Results: Thirteen studies with 15,412 participants were included. Mortality at 30 days (OR 5.70; 95% CI [1.34-24.36]) and 2 years (OR 4.40; 95% CI [2.60-7.44]) were significantly higher in the combined pre-TAVI and concomitant PCI group than in the post-TAVI cohort. Rates of other periprocedural complications, such as stroke and bleeding, varied across studies. Conclusion: There is no clear consensus on PCI timing in TAVI due to a lack of high-quality randomised data. An individualised, algorithmic approach is proposed for managing CAD in patients undergoing TAVI.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.