ArticleFrontiers in digital health2025
Generative AI in healthcare: challenges to patient agency and ethical implications.
Article in Frontiers in digital health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Ethical integration of patient-reported outcomes and digital biomarkers in AI healthcare models: an expert consensus framework.Frontiers in digital health · 2026Article
- Ethical issues in multi-agent AI systems for healthcare: a narrative review.Frontiers in public health · 2026Review
- Artificial intelligence in digital mental health technology: Considerations for regulation.Digital healthReview
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Clinical research is no longer a monopolistic environment wherein patients and participants are the sole voice of information. The introduction and acceleration of AI-based methods in healthcare is creating a complex environment where human-derived data is no longer the sole mechanism through which researchers and clinicians explore and test their hypotheses. The concept of self-agency is intimately tied into this, as generative data does not encompass the same person-lived experiences as human-derived data. The lack of accountability and transparency in recognizing data sources supporting medical and research decisions has the potential to immediately and negatively impact patient care. This commentary considers how self-agency is being confronted by the introduction and proliferation of generative AI, and discusses future directions to improve, rather than undermine AI-fueled healthcare progress.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.