Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40607182›Full record

ArticleRoyal Society open science2025

Automatic titration detection method of organic matter content based on machine vision.

Bingjie Zhang, Meng Li, Qing Song, Lujian Xu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Royal Society open science, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Bingjie ZhangUniversity of Jinan, Jinan, People's Republic of China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0002-2463-7789
Meng LiUniversity of Jinan, Jinan, People's Republic of China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7680-1451
Qing SongUniversity of Jinan, Jinan, People's Republic of China.
Lujian XuUniversity of Jinan, Jinan, People's Republic of China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This article proposes an automatic titration algorithm for organic matter content detection based on machine vision, which addresses the disadvantages of high risk factor, strong odour, significant pollution to laboratory environment and slow efficiency of manual titration in organic matter detection. First, by analysing the colour change characteristics during the titration process, machine learning techniques are used to classify the titration speed, and a titration experiment state recognition model is constructed to divide the titration speed into four categories and improve titration efficiency; Second, through a large number of titration experiments to collect relevant data and extract key feature parameters, an efficient titration algorithm based on histogram similarity was designed to accurately identify titration endpoints and improve detection accuracy. This study not only solves the limitations of manual operation in traditional titration methods, but also provides new ideas and methods for the automation and intelligence of chemical titration. The test results showed that the device had a titration error of less than 0.2 ml and was more efficient than manual titration. When comparing the results with manual titration, no statistically significant difference was observed when paired

Indexed as

endpoint detectionmachine learningorganic matter detectionsupervised classification

Identifiers

PMID40607182
PMCPMC12212985

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.