ReviewBioactive materials2025
Bidirectional mechanisms and emerging strategies for implantable bioelectronic interfaces.
Review in Bioactive materials, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Flexible Multimodal Neural Probe with Integrated Three-Electrode Aptameric Sensing for In Vivo Monitoring of Dopamine Dynamics and Neural Activity.ACS chemical neuroscience · 2026Article
- Foreign Body Response to Neuroimplantation: Machine Learning-Assisted Quantitative Analysis of Astrogliosis.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Article
- Multiscale Engineering of Ion-Conducting Gels for Sustainable Bioelectronic Systems.Small methods · 2026Review
- Intracortical Microstimulation in Brain-Computer Interfaces: Evoking Perception and Plasticity.Cyborg and bionic systems (Washington, D.C.) · 2026Review
- Spatiotemporal dynamics of neuronal subtypes and their interactions with glia following intracortical electrode implantation.Biology direct · 2025Article
- Neurovascular Signaling at the Gliovascular Interface: From Flow Regulation to Cognitive Energy Coupling.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Neural network functionality depends on the signaling of excitable cells and intricate synaptic connections, which collectively promote advanced functions of the brain, such as perception, motor control, and cognition. Neurological diseases may cause changes in the structure and connection patterns of neural networks, thereby leading to loss of motor and sensory functions. Neural interfaces are dependable tools for recording or stimulating neural circuit dynamics, but conventional neural implants do not align with the physicochemical characteristics of living tissues, resulting in eventual failure of these interface devices. These challenges in neuroengineering have spurred progress in materials science. In this account, we explore the interaction mechanisms between electrodes and biological tissues, offering strategies to meet the electrochemical and biocompatibility demands of bioelectronic interfaces in engineering, with an emphasis on the structural design and manufacturing technologies of implantable devices.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.