ReviewImaging science in dentistry2025
Radiographic relationship of third molars with the mandibular canal as a predictor of inferior alveolar nerve sensory disturbance: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
Review in Imaging science in dentistry, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Multimodal transformer-enhanced deep learning for accurate assessment of mandibular third molar-inferior alveolar canal contact using panoramic radiography and CBCT slices.BMC oral health · 2026Article
- Comparative Analysis of Diagnostic Accuracy of OPG and CBCT in the Evaluation of Impacted Mandibular third Molar Proximity to the Mandibular Canal.Current medical imaging · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: This study was performed to assess the relationship of the third molars with the mandibular canal as a predictor of inferior alveolar nerve (IAN) sensory disturbances using panoramic radiography (PR) and cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT). Materials and Methods: A systematic search was conducted of 4 databases-PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and Google Scholar-for the period from 1985 to 2024. In the retrieved articles, the outcome of interest was the relationship of the mandibular canal with the third molars on PR and CBCT scans. The risk of bias was assessed using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale, and quantitative meta-analysis was performed using STATA. A random-effects restricted maximum likelihood model was employed for the meta-analysis, and the I Results: A total of 1,635 articles were initially retrieved. After a rigorous selection process, 20 studies were included in the qualitative synthesis, and 8 were selected for the meta-analysis. The findings indicated that CBCT yielded higher prevalence rates for root darkening, root deflection, interruption of the white line, diversion of the mandibular canal, and narrowing of the mandibular canal (theta values: 49.962, 4.76, 8.09, 2.229, and 4.708, respectively) compared with PR (theta values: 1.363, 1.605, 6.322, 0.655, and 1.449, respectively). Conclusion: CBCT was more accurate than PR in investigating predictors of IAN paresthesia in mandibular third molar surgery. Considering the higher prevalence of paresthesia in the presence of root darkening, CBCT may be highly efficient in detecting this parameter and thus aiding in the prevention of paresthesia.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.