ReviewImaging science in dentistry2025
Diagnostic performance of deep learning models in classifying mandibular third molar and mandibular canal contact status on panoramic radiographs: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
Review in Imaging science in dentistry, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Multimodal transformer-enhanced deep learning for accurate assessment of mandibular third molar-inferior alveolar canal contact using panoramic radiography and CBCT slices.BMC oral health · 2026Article
- A Deep Learning Model for Second-Molar Lesions Related to Impacted Third Molars.International dental journal · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: Panoramic radiographs have recently become a platform for deep learning models, which show potential in enhancing diagnostic accuracy for detecting contact between mandibular third molars and the mandibular canal. However, detailed information regarding the accuracy of these models in identifying such contact remains limited. Materials and Methods: In accordance with the PRISMA-2020 and PRISMA-DTA guidelines, the PubMed, ScienceDirect, Web of Science, Embase, and EBSCO databases were systematically searched up to September 2024. Eligible studies employed deep learning models based on convolutional neural networks to classify the contact between mandibular third molars and the mandibular canal. Extracted metrics included accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, precision, and F1-score. A meta-analysis using random effects models pooled these performance metrics, while univariate and multivariate meta-regressions were conducted to explore sources of heterogeneity. Study quality was assessed using the QUADAS-2 tool. Results: Seven studies incorporating 4,955 panoramic radiographs reported pooled performance metrics of 83.4% accuracy, 80.2% sensitivity, 85.8% specificity, 83.3% precision, and an F1-score of 80.9%. High heterogeneity (I Conclusion: Deep learning models exhibit significant promise in evaluating mandibular third molar and mandibular canal contact on panoramic radiographs, potentially complementing traditional methods. The adoption of standardized protocols, diverse datasets, and explainable artificial intelligence will be crucial for broader clinical application.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.