ArticleJournal of pathology informatics2025
A comparative usability assessment of computer input devices for navigating digital whole slide images.
Article in Journal of pathology informatics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Practical considerations for pathologists when selecting digital pathology systems: an ESDIP guide.The Journal of pathology · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Labs worldwide are increasingly adopting digital pathology due to its ability to facilitate electronic slide distribution and sharing, integration with artificial intelligence tools, and the various workflow improvements enabled by a digital interface. The availability of efficient controls for navigating whole slide images is an important aspect of successful implementation. In this usability study of controller devices, we configured our whole slide image viewer to support navigation using 10 different methodologies, including standard click-and-drag mouse movement, keyboard panning, videogame controllers, and more. Thirty-eight practicing pathologists and trainees volunteered to use these devices and provide feedback. The videogame console gamepad, SpaceMouse Pro, and large trackball emerged as the most preferred devices. After testing each device, 63% of participants indicated that they would need an alternative to standard mouse click-and-drag for effective and efficient case sign-out. These results highlight non-traditional image navigation devices as valuable options in digital pathology implementation and suggest an opportunity for image management systems to differentiate themselves in a competitive marketplace.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.