ArticleResuscitation plus2025
Airway management by ambulance nurses during out-of-hospital cardiac arrest.
Article in Resuscitation plus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Advanced Airway Device Use Order During Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest.JAMA network open · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Adequate airway management in out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) is crucial for ventilation and oxygenation. Advanced airway management with a supraglottic airway device (SAD) or endotracheal tube (ETT) follows bag-valve-mask (BVM) ventilation, with emergency front-of-neck access as a rescue-option. EMS protocols on airway management in OHCA have changed over the years and during the COVID-pandemic. This study assessed subsequent changes in airway management and the success of different strategies. Methods: An observational study was conducted with data from ARREST, 2019-2023. All consecutive adult OHCA patients who had resuscitation attempted by EMS were included. Patients were excluded if helicopter emergency medical services were involved. Changes in devices used intra-arrest and their first-pass success were analyzed. Results: The proportion of cases with an SAD attempt increased, and with an ETT decreased. The definitive airway device used was an SAD in 59% (95% CI: 57-60%), an ETT in 21% (95% CI: 19-22%), and BVM in 14% (95% CI: 13-15%). First pass success for ETT increased from 53% to 68%. Average SAD first pass success was 93%. Conclusion: During cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) by ambulance nurses, the use of SADs increased, and that of ETTs decreased. Although ETT first pass success improved, it was lower than the guideline-recommended standard for performing intubations prehospitally. First pass success for SAD was high. This adds support for current Dutch ambulance guidelines recommending an SAD for primary choice of advanced airway by EMS during CPR. However, improvement of intubation techniques and skills remain a necessity for selected OHCA patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.