Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40607020›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in nutrition2025

Machine learning and the nomogram as the accurate tools for predicting postoperative malnutrition risk in esophageal cancer patients.

Zhenmeng Lin, Hao He, Mingfang Yan, Xiamei Chen, Hanshen Chen, Jianfang Ke

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in nutrition, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Observational
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Zhenmeng LinDepartment of Thoracic Oncology Surgery, Clinical Oncology School of Fujian Medical University & Fujian Cancer Hospital, Fuzhou, China.
Hao HeDepartment of Thoracic Oncology Surgery, Clinical Oncology School of Fujian Medical University & Fujian Cancer Hospital, Fuzhou, China.
Mingfang YanDepartment of Anesthesiology Surgery, Clinical Oncology School of Fujian Medical University, Fujian Cancer Hospital, Fuzhou, China.
Xiamei ChenDepartment of Operation, Clinical Oncology School of Fujian Medical University & Fujian Cancer Hospital, Fuzhou, Fujian, China.
Hanshen ChenDepartment of Thoracic Oncology Surgery, First Affiliated Hospital of Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou, China.
Jianfang KeDepartment of Thoracic Oncology Surgery, Clinical Oncology School of Fujian Medical University & Fujian Cancer Hospital, Fuzhou, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Postoperative malnutrition is a prevalent complication following esophageal cancer surgery, significantly impairing clinical recovery and long-term prognosis. This study aimed to develop and validate predictive models using machine learning algorithms and a nomogram to estimate the risk of malnutrition at 1 month after esophagectomy. Methods: A total of 1,693 patients who underwent curative esophageal cancer surgery were analyzed, with 1,251 patients allocated to the development cohort and 442 to the validation cohort. Feature selection was performed via the least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) algorithm. Eight machine learning models were constructed and evaluated, alongside a nomogram developed through multivariable logistic regression. Results: The incidence of postoperative malnutrition was 45.4% (568/1,251) in the development cohort and 50.7% (224/442) in the validation cohort. Among machine learning models, the Random Forest (RF) model demonstrated optimal performance, achieving area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) values of 0.820 (95% CI: 0.796-0.845) and 0.805 (95% CI: 0.771-0.839) in the development and validation cohorts, respectively. The nomogram incorporated five clinically interpretable predictors: female gender, advanced age, low preoperative body mass index (BMI), neoadjuvant therapy history, and preoperative sarcopenia. It showed comparable discriminative ability, with AUCs of 0.801 (95% CI: 0.775-0.826) and 0.795 (95% CI: 0.764-0.828) in the respective cohorts ( Conclusion: Both machine learning and the nomogram provide accurate tools for predicting postoperative malnutrition risk in esophageal cancer patients. While RF showed marginally higher predictive performance, the nomogram offers superior clinical interpretability, making it a practical option for individualized risk stratification.

Indexed as

esophageal cancermachine learningnomogrampostoperative malnutritionsurgery

Identifiers

PMID40607020
PMCPMC12214435

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.