Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40607011›Full record

ArticleArrhythmia & electrophysiology review2025

One-year Outcomes of Permanent Pacemaker Implantation after Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement: CONDUCT Registry: A Propensity Score-Matched Comparison.

Michal Droppa, Tobias Geisler, Jans Baan, Niels-Erik Nielsen, Jacek Baranowski, Wilbert Wesselink, Jana Kurucova, Luis Hack, Anjaly Vijayan, Peter Bramlage and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Arrhythmia & electrophysiology review, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Michal DroppaDepartment of Cardiology and Angiology, University Hospital Tübingen Tübingen, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5807-7615
Tobias GeislerDepartment of Cardiology and Angiology, University Hospital Tübingen Tübingen, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8864-6038
Jans BaanHeart Center, Academic Medical Center, University of Amsterdam Amsterdam, the Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7993-1163
Niels-Erik NielsenDepartment of Cardiology, Linköping University Hospital Linköping, Sweden.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3633-0549
Jacek BaranowskiDepartment of Cardiology, Linköping University Hospital Linköping, Sweden.
Wilbert WesselinkEdwards Lifesciences Prague, Czech Republic.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6494-2919
Jana KurucovaEdwards Lifesciences Prague, Czech Republic.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0003-4704-0499
Luis HackDepartment of Cardiology and Angiology, University Hospital Tübingen Tübingen, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4614-8006
Anjaly VijayanInstitute for Pharmacology and Preventive Medicine Cloppenburg, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0009-0915-427X
Peter BramlageInstitute for Pharmacology and Preventive Medicine Cloppenburg, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4970-2110
Tanja K RudolphGeneral and Interventional Cardiology/Angiology, Heart and Diabetes Centre, Ruhr University Bad Oeynhausen, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8839-7476

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objectives: The occurrence of new conduction abnormalities necessitating permanent pacemaker implantation (PPI) is a complication of transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR). Previous studies have shown inconsistent results about the clinical impact of new PPI after TAVR. Methods: CONDUCT was a prospective observational registry that enrolled 295 patients undergoing TAVR at four European centres. The primary goal of this registry was to compare 1-year clinical outcomes in TAVR patients with or without PPI, using one-to-four propensity score matched (PSM) analysis. It also assessed major adverse cardiac events (MACE) in patients undergoing right ventricular pacing after PPI. Results: Out of 160 PSM patients, 36 underwent PPI and the other 124 had no PPI within 30 days post-TAVR. The median age of the patients was 80 years, with more men (80.6% and 84.7% in patients with and without PPI, respectively) and similar EuroSCORE II and Society of Thoracic Surgeons scores. Patients with PPI had higher diabetes prevalence (p=0.055) and lower left ventricular ejection fraction percentages (p=0.034), but higher systolic pulmonary artery pressure (p=0.013) than those without PPI. However, these differences diminished after PSM. At 1 year, PPI patients had a nonsignificant but slightly higher incidence of MACE (22.2% versus 13.7%; p=0.216) (HR 1.63; 95% CI [0.72-3.71]) driven by increased heart failure (11.1% versus 2.4%; p=0.046) (HR 5.05; 95% CI [1.09-23.4]). Freedom from all-cause mortality, cardiovascular death, stroke and endocarditis at 1-year follow-up was comparable between groups. Conclusion: Despite a higher incidence of congestive heart failure rehospitalisation in patients undergoing PPI, 1-year clinical outcomes were similar in both groups.

Indexed as

Aortic stenosispermanent pacemaker implantationtranscatheter aortic valve replacement

Identifiers

PMID40607011
PMCPMC12215416

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.