ArticleFrontiers in oncology2025
Network pharmacology mechanisms and experimental verification of
Article in Frontiers in oncology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) represents the predominant head-neck malignancy in China. While the Hedyotis Diffusae Herba-Scutellariae Barbatae Herba (HDH-SBH) herb pair shows antitumor potential, its mechanism against NPC remains unclear. Methods: This network pharmacology study integrated with experimental validation identified NPC-related targets through GEO database and disease databases (OMIM, GeneCards, TTD). Active components of HDH-SBH and their targets were retrieved from Traditional Chinese Medicine Systems Pharmacology Database (TCMSP). Common targets were analyzed via STRING, with functional enrichment using Gene Ontology (GO) and Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG). Core components were validated through molecular docking and Results: We identified 36 bioactive components and 155 shared targets, with quercetin, luteolin, wogonin, and β-sitosterol emerging as core components. KEGG analysis highlighted PI3K/AKT pathway inhibition (P<0.05). Molecular docking confirmed strong binding between core components and key targets (AKT1, TP53, BCL2). Conclusions: Based on the network pharmacology approach, we predicted the potential mechanism of HDH-SBH for the treatment of NPC, which provided a new idea for further research on its pharmacological mechanism.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.