ArticleFrontiers in oncology2025
CT-based radiomics integrated model for brain metastases in stage III/IV ALK-positive lung adenocarcinoma patients.
Article in Frontiers in oncology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: This study aims to develop and validate a computed tomography (CT)-based radiomics nomogram for predicting brain metastases in lung adenocarcinoma with anaplastic lymphoma kinase positive (ALK+). Methods: Of 117 patients were retrospectively reviewed, among them, 34 patients from another hospital. Patients were randomly allocated into training (70%) and validation (30%) cohorts. We integrated the radiomics score (Rad_score) with independent clinic-radiological variables to build the nomogram model. The DeLong test and Decision curve analysis (DCA) were utilized to evaluate performance of three models. Cox regression analysis was used to identify statistically significant factors for progression-free survival (PFS) in ALK-positive lung adenocarcinoma, with model discrimination evaluated by the concordance index (C-index). The patients were divided into low-risk and high-risk groups. Finally, the Log-rank test was used to ascertain significant differences between the two risk groups in the nomogram models. Results: From Stage III/IV lung cancer cases, we extracted 1834 radiomics features, identifying two features can serve as standalone indicators of BM. The AUC of radiomics model was 0.905 and 0.880 in the validation and external test cohort, respectively. The AUC of nomogram model was 0.940 in the validation cohort and 0.896 in the external test cohort, respectively. The statistical difference merely exists between nomogram and clinical model ( Conclusion: CT-derived radiomic signatures show promise as a tool for predicting BM within 2 years after detection of primary lung adenocarcinoma detection with ALK+. Combing these radiomic signatures with clinical features can enhance risk stratification for these patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.