ArticleFrontiers in oncology2025
Case Report: A 55 kg retroperitoneal liposarcoma.
Article in Frontiers in oncology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Retroperitoneal multiple giant liposarcoma: a case report.Frontiers in surgery · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Sarcomas, which are mesenchymal malignancies, account for less than 1% of all cancers. Retroperitoneal liposarcoma (RPLS), particularly the well-differentiated subtype, often presents as large masses due to its deep anatomical location and indolent growth pattern. Moreover, its frequent adherence to vital structures poses significant challenges for complete surgical resection. Case presentation: A 62-year-old male was admitted to the hospital due to the gradual enlargement of a mass in the abdomen and pelvis over the past 20 years. In the recent five months, the mass has significantly increased in size, leading to compression symptoms such as dyspnea and lower limb edema. Physical examination showed that the abdomen was distended, and varicose veins on the abdominal wall were visible. The peak value of the abdominal circumference reached 165 cm. Abdominal and pelvic CT examination indicated that there was a huge mass with mixed density in the abdominal and pelvic cavity, which contained lipid, calcification, and soft tissue density shadows. The lesion was so huge that it exceeded the scanning field, and its size could not be measured. Subsequently, the patient underwent a resection of the huge retroperitoneal tumor and a combined resection of multiple organs under general anesthesia. The huge retroperitoneal mass, approximately 70*54*20 cm in size and weighing 55 kg, was removed. The postoperative pathology confirmed it as well-differentiated liposarcoma. The surgical process was relatively smooth. However, unfortunately, 40 days after the operation, the patient died of multiple organ dysfunction due to pneumonia, heart failure, and intra-abdominal infection after anastomotic leakage. Conclusions: While Complete surgical resection (R0) remains the gold standard for RPLS management, radical multivisceral resection of massive tumors requires meticulous evaluation by a multidisciplinary team (MDT), encompassing patient fitness, tumor biology, and perioperative risk stratification. When achieving R0 resection is deemed unfeasible or carries prohibitive risks, staged debulking surgery may be considered as an alternative approach. The application of hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) should be evaluated judiciously on a case-by-case basis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.