ArticleFrontiers in oncology2025
New perspectives on extracorporeal life support: expert teams and precise selection of candidates are transforming pediatric cancer and hematopoietic cell transplantation care.
Article in Frontiers in oncology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Extra Corporeal Life Support (ECLS) for pediatric oncology and stem cell transplant patients over the past two decades has made progress. Substantial improvements in ECLS, Continuous Renal Replacement Therapy (CRRT), and mechanical ventilation techniques, along with enhanced anticoagulation management and infection control, have contributed to better patient outcomes. Additionally, advancements in HLA matching, donor selection, and the management of chemotherapy and transplant complications have further improved survival rates. The authors propose establishing an expert team and a standardized process to evaluate ECLS candidacy, addressing past controversies and optimizing outcomes for this vulnerable population. The criteria for candidacy have evolved significantly, necessitating expert evaluation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.