ArticleFrontiers in oncology2025
Laparoscopic counterclockwise modular mesohepatectomy for hepatocellular carcinoma: a standardized anatomical approach (with video).
Article in Frontiers in oncology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Laparoscopic liver resection (LLR) is increasingly utilized for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). However, laparoscopic anatomical resection of Couinaud segments 4, 5, and 8 remains technically demanding due to complex vascular anatomy and a broad transection plane. Methods: This study retrospectively analyzed patients who underwent laparoscopic counterclockwise modular mesohepatectomy (LCMM) at our center. The LCMM approach standardizes the dissection sequence, optimizes vascular control, and utilizes Laennec's capsule theory to facilitate safe and precise anatomical liver resection. Perioperative outcomes, including operative time, intraoperative blood loss, and postoperative complications, were assessed. Results: A total of 12 patients with centrally located HCC underwent LCMM. The mean operative time was 253.66 ± 52.47 minutes, and the mean intraoperative blood loss was 177.91 ± 112.76 mL. No conversions to open surgery or intraoperative transfusions were required. The mean postoperative hospital stay was 9.83 ± 4.26 days. Postoperative complications occurred in three patients (one bile leakage, one pulmonary infection, and one posthepatectomy liver failure). No perioperative mortality occurred. The mean disease-free survival (DFS) was 18.75 months. Conclusion: LCMM appears to be a technically effective and anatomically guided approach for managing centrally located HCC. It facilitates intraoperative control of key vascular structures and yields promising short-term oncological outcomes. Further prospective studies are warranted to confirm its long-term efficacy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.