ArticleEcancermedicalscience2025
Management and survival outcomes of patients with lung cancer at a leading radiotherapy centre in Sub-Saharan Africa: a cross-sectional study.
Article in Ecancermedicalscience, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Meta-analysis of tuberculosis incidence and risk in cancer patients treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors.Frontiers in oncology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Lung cancer is a major global health challenge that has a substantial impact on the health and well-being of many individuals. Despite the progress that has been made in its treatment globally, there is a paucity of reliable data on management and survival outcomes in sub-Saharan Africa. Aim: To describe the clinical profiles, management and survival outcomes of patients with lung cancer. Methods: This research was a cross-sectional study conducted at a leading radiotherapy centre in Ghana. The study involved adult patients with lung cancer who received treatment over a 10-year period. A consecutive random sampling technique was used to select eligible participants for the study. Relevant data were extracted from patients' hospital-based medical records. Data were analysed with STATA (version 17). Kaplan-Meier survival analyses were used to estimate overall survival (OS) outcomes. Cox proportional hazards models were used to identify prognostic factors associated with survival outcomes. Results: In all, there were 118 patients with a male predominance of 53.4%. The mean age was 59.4 years (± 13), with a significant proportion being geriatric (> 60 years) (48.3%). Also, there were more nonsmokers than smokers (57.6% versus 33.9%), with only 6.8% having a positive family history for cancer. Notably, 4.2% had a history of treatment for pulmonary tuberculosis, while ~75% were diagnosed at advanced stages of lung cancer (stage IVA = 48.3% and IVB = 27.1%). Most patients were diagnosed with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) (94.9%). Management was essentially palliative (65.3%), and with the use of systemic therapy (72.3%). Only 3.4% and 1.7% received targeted and immunotherapy, respectively. Patients <60 years had better OS compared with those ≥ 60 years ( Conclusion: The predominance of advanced-stage disease, reliance on palliative care, systemic chemotherapy and disparities in access to advanced therapies highlight significant challenges faced by healthcare providers. Addressing these barriers through targeted interventions, infrastructure investments and policy changes could significantly improve lung cancer outcomes in the region. A focus on early detection, comprehensive diagnostics and equitable access to advanced treatments is essential for enhancing survival rates and quality of life for lung cancer patients in this region.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.