Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40606836›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in neuroscience2025

The ReHand-BCI trial: a randomized controlled trial of a brain-computer interface for upper extremity stroke neurorehabilitation.

Jessica Cantillo-Negrete, Martín Emiliano Rodríguez-García, Paul Carrillo-Mora, Oscar Arias-Carrión, Emmanuel Ortega-Robles, Marlene A Galicia-Alvarado, Raquel Valdés-Cristerna, Ana G Ramirez-Nava, Claudia Hernandez-Arenas, Jimena Quinzaños-Fresnedo and 3 more

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in neuroscience, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04724824 (Validation of a Brain-Computer Interface for Neurorehabilitation With a Randomized Controlled Trial), which is not on this map. Cited by 8 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04724824 nacompletednot on this map

Validation of a Brain-Computer Interface for Neurorehabilitation With a Randomized Controlled Trial (Validación de Una Interfaz Cerebro-Computadora Para Rehabilitación Neurológica Por Medio de un Ensayo Clínico Controlado y Aleatorizado)

TypeinterventionalSponsorInstituto Nacional de RehabilitacionRan2021 to 2024Enrolled23ConditionsStroke, Ischemic, StrokeArmsBrain-Computer Interface, Sham Brain-Computer Interface
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Trial
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Jessica Cantillo-NegreteTechnological Research Subdirection, Instituto Nacional de Rehabilitacion Luis Guillermo Ibarra Ibarra, Mexico City, Mexico.
Martín Emiliano Rodríguez-GarcíaElectrical Engineering Department, Universidad Autonoma Metropolitana - Iztapalapa, Mexico City, Mexico.
Paul Carrillo-MoraDivision of Research in Clinical Neuroscience, Instituto Nacional de Rehabilitacion Luis Guillermo Ibarra Ibarra, Mexico City, Mexico.
Oscar Arias-CarriónUnidad de Trastornos de Movimiento y Sueño (TMS), Hospital General Dr Manuel Gea Gonzalez, Mexico City, Mexico.
Emmanuel Ortega-RoblesUnidad de Trastornos de Movimiento y Sueño (TMS), Hospital General Dr Manuel Gea Gonzalez, Mexico City, Mexico.
Marlene A Galicia-AlvaradoDivision of Research in Clinical Neuroscience, Instituto Nacional de Rehabilitacion Luis Guillermo Ibarra Ibarra, Mexico City, Mexico.
Raquel Valdés-CristernaElectrical Engineering Department, Universidad Autonoma Metropolitana - Iztapalapa, Mexico City, Mexico.
Ana G Ramirez-NavaDivision of Neurological Rehabilitation, Instituto Nacional de Rehabilitacion Luis Guillermo Ibarra Ibarra, Mexico City, Mexico.
Claudia Hernandez-ArenasDivision of Neurological Rehabilitation, Instituto Nacional de Rehabilitacion Luis Guillermo Ibarra Ibarra, Mexico City, Mexico.
Jimena Quinzaños-FresnedoDivision of Neurological Rehabilitation, Instituto Nacional de Rehabilitacion Luis Guillermo Ibarra Ibarra, Mexico City, Mexico.
Ma Del Refugio Pacheco-GallegosDivision of Neurological Rehabilitation, Instituto Nacional de Rehabilitacion Luis Guillermo Ibarra Ibarra, Mexico City, Mexico.
Norma Marín-ArriagaDivision of Imaging, Instituto Nacional de Rehabilitacion Luis Guillermo Ibarra Ibarra, Mexico City, Mexico.
Ruben I Carino-EscobarDivision of Research in Clinical Neuroscience, Instituto Nacional de Rehabilitacion Luis Guillermo Ibarra Ibarra, Mexico City, Mexico.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Brain-computer interfaces (BCI) are a promising complementary therapy for stroke rehabilitation due to the close-loop feedback that can be provided with these systems, but more evidence is needed regarding their clinical and neuroplasticity effects. Methods: A randomized controlled trial was performed using the ReHand-BCI system that provides feedback with a robotic hand orthosis. The experimental group (EG) used the ReHand-BCI, while sham-BCI was given to the control group (CG). Both groups performed 30 therapy sessions, with primary outcomes being the Fugl-Meyer Assessment for the Upper Extremity (FMA-UE) and the Action Research Arm Test (ARAT). Secondary outcomes were hemispheric dominance, measured with electroencephalography and functional magnetic resonance imaging, white matter integrity via diffusion tensor imaging, and corticospinal tract integrity and excitability, measured with transcranial magnetic stimulation. Results: At post-treatment, patients in both groups had significantly different FMA-UE scores (EG: baseline = 24.5[20, 36], post-treatment 28[23, 43], CG: baseline = 26[16, 37.5], post-treatment = 34[17.3, 46.5]), while only the EG had significantly different ARAT scores at post-treatment (EG: baseline = 8.5[5, 26], post-treatment = 20[7, 36], CG: baseline = 3[1.8, 30.5], post-treatment = 15[2.5, 40.8]). In addition, across the intervention, the EG showed trends of more pronounced ipsilesional cortical activity and higher ipsilesional corticospinal tract integrity, although these differences were not statistically different compared to the control group, likely due to the study's sample size. Conclusion: To the authors' knowledge, this is the first clinical trial that has assessed such a wide range of physiological effects across a long BCI intervention, implying that a more pronounced ipsilesional hemispheric dominance is associated with upper extremity motor recovery. Therefore, the study brings light into the neuroplasticity effects of a closed-loop BCI-based neurorehabilitation intervention in stroke. Clinical trial registration: https://clinicaltrials.gov/, identifier NCT04724824.

Indexed as

brain-computer interfaceEEGmagnetic resonance imagingrobotstroketranscranial magnetic stimulation

Identifiers

PMID40606836
PMCPMC12216668

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.