SynthesisFrontiers in psychiatry2025
Research on functional constipation with anxiety or depression: a bibliometric analysis.
Synthesis in Frontiers in psychiatry, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Although the phenomenon of functional constipation (FC) that accompanies anxiety or depression has been extensively investigated worldwide, no bibliometric studies are available in this regard. This study therefore aimed to analyze the current status and extent of research and areas of interest in the study of FC with anxiety or depression. Methods: Data from studies on FC with anxiety or depression, that were performed between 2003 and 2024, were retrieved from the Web of Science Core Collection database. Data regarding the annual number of publications, authors, countries, and references were assessed using CiteSpace v6.3.R1 (64-bit) and Microsoft Excel, and those pertaining to keywords and cited authors were evaluated using VOSviewer 1.6.20. The co-occurrence and clustering functions were then used to generate visual knowledge maps. Results: The overall annual publication volume demonstrated an upward trend between 2003 and 2024; this was indicative of promising research prospects. The 427 publications identified included 6 types of papers, among which original research articles represented the highest proportion (357 [83.61%] articles published across 200 journals). Conclusion: Future studies in the field of basic medicine need to determine the etiology and pathogenesis of FC with anxiety or depression; in particular, they need to evaluate the role of opioid drugs as a key etiological factor. The role played by the brain-gut axis also warrants investigation. From the clinical perspective, studies need to focus on evidence-based medicine; particular emphasis needs to be placed on randomized double-blind controlled trials with stringent quality control, high-quality meta-analyses, and evaluation of questionnaires and scales. Treatment techniques need to be explored in greater detail; in this context, it is recommended that fecal microbiota transplantation and biofeedback therapy are adopted in the clinic. Furthermore, Patients with FC, especially those with a history of anxiety or depression, tend to have overlapping dyspepsia symptoms.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.