ArticleInternational journal of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease2025
In Silico Lung Deposition Profiles of Three Single-Inhaler Triple Therapies in Patients with COPD Using Functional Respiratory Imaging.
Article in International journal of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed.
- Budesonide/formoterol fumarate dihydrateERJ open research · 2026Article
- Budesonide/formoterol fumarate dihydrateERJ open research · 2026Article
- Precision treatment of COPD based on novel imaging phenotypes: a treatable traits approach.Respiratory research · 2026Review
- Enhancing aerosol delivery in asthma and COPD: a comparison of MDI, valved holding chamber, and DPI systems using functional respiratory imaging (FRI).Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Real-World Outcomes in Patients with COPD Initiating Budesonide/Glycopyrronium/Formoterol Fumarate Dihydrate After Dual and Triple Therapy in Spain: A Sub-Study of the ORESTES Study.Pulmonary therapy · 2026Article
- Identification of imaging-based pulmonary and extrapulmonary treatable traits in COPD: a review.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Review
- In silico Lung Deposition Profiles of Three Single-Inhaler Triple Therapies in Patients with COPD Using Functional Respiratory Imaging [Letter].International journal of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease · 2026Article
- Response to the Letter to the Editor by Zambelli et al for In Silico Lung Deposition Profiles of Three Single-Inhaler Triple Therapies in Patients With COPD Using Functional Respiratory Imaging [Response To Letter].International journal of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Introduction: Inhalation is the foundational route for administering pharmacological treatments for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). Given the relevance of both large and small airways in COPD, lung distribution deposition characteristics of different inhaler options could influence treatment effects. This study evaluated the total deposition of 3 single-inhaler triple therapies in the large and small airways. Methods: This study assessed lung deposition of different inhalers using in silico functional respiratory imaging from 20 patients with COPD. The first part evaluated budesonide/glycopyrronium/formoterol fumarate dihydrate (BGF) pressurized metered-dose inhaler (pMDI), beclomethasone dipropionate/glycopyrronium/formoterol fumarate dihydrate (BDP/G/F) pMDI, and fluticasone furoate/umeclidinium/vilanterol (FF/UMEC/VI) dry powder inhaler (DPI) at 30 L/min. The second part assessed BGF pMDI and FF/UMEC/VI DPI at 60 L/min. Results: All 3 inhalers had different in silico total lung and large and small airways deposition profiles at 30 L/min, with BGF pMDI (54.8% to 57.7%) demonstrating a higher deposition profile across each therapeutic component versus BDP/G/F pMDI (38.6% to 40.5%) and FF/UMEC/VI DPI (24.0% to 36.1%), respectively. Similarly, at 60 L/min, the total deposition of all 3 components of BGF pMDI (57.2% to 58.5%) remained higher compared with FF/UMEC/VI DPI (19.8% to 34.1%). Conclusion: These findings provide quantitative insights into relative lung deposition distribution profiles and efficiency of delivery for 3 inhaler options. Further research is needed to understand if these deposition patterns could translate into real-world clinical effectiveness differences.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.