Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40606805›Full record

ArticlePlastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open2025

Winning the Global Surgery War: A Conceptual Framework.

Peter M Nthumba

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Plastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Perspectives in Plastic Surgery: View of Plastic Surgeons From Kenya.Plastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open · 2026
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Peter M NthumbaFrom the Department of Plastic Surgery, AIC Kijabe Hospital, Kijabe, Kenya.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Global surgery (GS), which comprises surgery, obstetrics, and anesthesia, is a complex multidisciplinary enterprise that focuses on the provision of timely, safe, and equitable surgical care to the global population. As with any war, understating the burden of surgical disease risks failure in any crafted strategy, as the measures would be substantially inadequate. Using strategies from successful large-scale interventions, the author proposes a conceptual framework for sustainable GS scale-up. Methods: The author collated GS scale-up strategies from the literature and aligned them with the 6 core indicator metrics as the primary outcome measures. Results: The proposed conceptual framework hangs on the successes of the Marshall Plan for Europe and the World Health Organization multimodal strategy for infection control and prevention to provide funding and intervention models, successively, for GS scale-up. Smile Train and Operation Smile strategies for strengthening surgical systems provide potential learning points for GS scalability. Collaborating with these and other surgical nongovernmental organizations and harnessing their experiences and networks promises potential for success in GS scale-up. Conclusions: The proposed conceptual framework provides potential sustainable GS scale-up, using a nonprescriptive "bundled" intervention approach, permitting individual countries to progress at their own pace, while allowing for transparent sharing of learned experiences.

Identifiers

PMID40606805
PMCPMC12212797

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.