ArticlePlastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open2025
Winning the Global Surgery War: A Conceptual Framework.
Article in Plastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Perspectives in Plastic Surgery: View of Plastic Surgeons From Kenya.Plastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Global surgery (GS), which comprises surgery, obstetrics, and anesthesia, is a complex multidisciplinary enterprise that focuses on the provision of timely, safe, and equitable surgical care to the global population. As with any war, understating the burden of surgical disease risks failure in any crafted strategy, as the measures would be substantially inadequate. Using strategies from successful large-scale interventions, the author proposes a conceptual framework for sustainable GS scale-up. Methods: The author collated GS scale-up strategies from the literature and aligned them with the 6 core indicator metrics as the primary outcome measures. Results: The proposed conceptual framework hangs on the successes of the Marshall Plan for Europe and the World Health Organization multimodal strategy for infection control and prevention to provide funding and intervention models, successively, for GS scale-up. Smile Train and Operation Smile strategies for strengthening surgical systems provide potential learning points for GS scalability. Collaborating with these and other surgical nongovernmental organizations and harnessing their experiences and networks promises potential for success in GS scale-up. Conclusions: The proposed conceptual framework provides potential sustainable GS scale-up, using a nonprescriptive "bundled" intervention approach, permitting individual countries to progress at their own pace, while allowing for transparent sharing of learned experiences.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.