ReviewNPP - digital psychiatry and neuroscience2025
Neuropsychopharmacology in the era of artificial intelligence and biomolecule prediction software.
Review in NPP - digital psychiatry and neuroscience, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Blocking the Reflection: Milestones and Hurdles for Digital Twins in Mental Health.Pharmacopsychiatry · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The development and adoption of artificial intelligence (AI) provides moonshot opportunities to redefine how we generate treatments for neuropsychiatric disease. Despite the rapid advancement of AI across biomedical spheres, its implementation in drug discovery, proteomics, and neurobiology has been met with new and unexpected limitations. Historically, neuropharmacology research has used observational and invasive experimental approaches to identify novel therapeutics. Unfortunately, this classic approach suffers from laborious chemical synthesis and in vivo testing which ultimately leads to translational bottlenecks. With the implementation of AI, we are now able to expedite this early testing by modeling how a drug or protein complex may interact with a receptor of interest. By applying powerful, precision-based protein structure prediction tools, we can better tailor therapeutics and minimize undesired outcomes. Though promising, important caveats like predicting chirality of molecules, conformational changes upon binding, and determining downstream signaling elements remain critical roadblocks that functionally limit the efficacy of prediction software. This Perspective article will briefly discuss how AI-powered protein prediction software will impact drug development to transform neuropsychopharmacology research and therapeutics, while also providing insights into the limitations of these digital tools.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.